Re: [NF] Arago

Author: Kurt at VR-FX

Posted: 2016-12-19 at 19:35:48

Wow, 15-20 min sounds Painful!

That being said, of course, when I would render 3D Images, 15-20 min for

a single image is NOT out of the Ordinary!

-K-

On 12/19/2016 8:23 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:

>

>> I'm not certain, Gene. The last paragraph of the review refers to

>> Arago's

>> "true .EXE compiler," implying that FoxPro's wasn't. But the only

>> distinction the review actually gives is that Arago's compiled file

>> sizes

>> were substantially smaller than FoxPro's.

>

> As I said initially, with the Arago Quicksilver compiler for dbXL, you

> got one self-contained executable. No separate runtime file, no

> requirement for any dll dependencies like you have with VFP.

>

> It would take 15-20 minutes to compile a moderate-sized project on a

> 386 40 MHz machine.

>

> Ken Dibble

> www.stic-cil.org

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b29fa912-2e88-1bf0-17a5-ab80158c692c@optonline.net

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Kurt at VR-FX