RE: [NF] Arago

Author: Ken Dibble

Posted: 2016-12-19 at 19:23:04

>I'm not certain, Gene. The last paragraph of the review refers to Arago's

>"true .EXE compiler," implying that FoxPro's wasn't. But the only

>distinction the review actually gives is that Arago's compiled file sizes

>were substantially smaller than FoxPro's.

As I said initially, with the Arago Quicksilver compiler for dbXL,

you got one self-contained executable. No separate runtime file, no

requirement for any dll dependencies like you have with VFP.

It would take 15-20 minutes to compile a moderate-sized project on a

386 40 MHz machine.

Ken Dibble

www.stic-cil.org

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2F.21.28949.88788585@cdptpa-omsmta02

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Ken Dibble