Re: InteractiveChange and ProgrammaticChange Oddness

Author: Gene Wirchenko

Posted: 2016-06-17 at 11:43:21

At 11:20 2016-06-15, Ken Dibble <krdibble@stny.rr.com> wrote:

>[Gene Wirchenko wrote:]

>> A VFP bug is possible. I had a case with aliases where VFP

>> lost track somehow. This was in a loop where the loop could have

>> executed thousands of times on the table. It was also in code

>> that had run fine for quite a while.

>>

>> What are the types and values of this.value and

>> this.oldvalue? Dump out that in your error handler. You might

>> have a VFP bug, but you might have something you overlooked.

>

>Have done, and if I'm still alive and not retired the next time it

>happens, I'll let you know what I find.

Next up: the mixed feelings should you find the cause. The

satisfaction of having nailed it. The dissatisfaction that you had to.

The best I can suggest is to start suspecting

everything. Start close to the problem and spread out as

needed. That is what I did with my alias problem noted above. My

code should have worked and usually did, but since it did not, I had

to kludge it.

Best of luck.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Gene Wirchenko