RE: Alternatives to Master and Slave Terminology Redux

Author: Geoff Flight

Posted: 2015-12-13 at 16:26:32

Being Australian we have no cultural sensitivities to slavery, but to be

honest, master/slave works perfectly and was the reason it was used in the

first place. From my perspective, I simply dont get the problem other than

the growing problem with political correctness. What is going to happen

when electricians need to no longer use male and female plugs and how on

earth do we include transexual plugs?

-----Original Message-----

From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Gene Wirchenko

Sent: Saturday, 12 December 2015 8:58 AM

To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>

Subject: Alternatives to Master and Slave Terminology Redux

Dear Vixens and Reynards:

I realise that it is Friday afternoon, but I work then, too.

I really do want some terminology that is accurate, minimally

offensive, and that does not sound stupid.

Have another look at my use case:

2) The second one is puzzling me. I have forms with an (often) key

portion (master) and a non-key portion (slave). "key" and "non-key" are

awkward and do not communicate well to a non-IT person. "parent" and

"child" is not accurate. What do you suggest?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01a601d135f5$51f86cf0$f5e946d0$@adam.com.au

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2015 Geoff Flight