Re: windows server 2012 essentials r2

Author: Mike Copeland

Posted: 2014-12-04 at 12:34:38

+1

Alan Bourke wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 01:13 AM, Paul McNett wrote:

>> Wouldn't some sort of

>> text output along with a timestamp be better, so I could step away and

>> come back and see if the state has changed at all? Especially on a

>> server? Don't system admins want output?

>>

> I would definitely prefer a more Linux-like approach in these things,

> where you can see exactly what the hell it's doing even if you have to

> click a button to do it. Sort of like the Ubuntu update procedure.

>

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5480A93E.4060105@ggisoft.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2014 Mike Copeland