Re: [NF] Reverse Engineering . Legality

Author: Jeff Johnson

Posted: 2013-07-09 at 18:18:30

I agree, but what do you think about this? There is a medical hardware

company that sold their devices with software. The software company

went out of business and a lot of people legally own the hardware and

software but it is unusable because they can't get installation codes.

What would you call it if someone reverse engineered the installation

codes so the users could use their equipment?

Jeff

---------------

Jeff Johnson

jeff@san-dc.com

(623) 582-0323

www.san-dc.com

www.arelationshipmanager.com

On 07/09/2013 04:09 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:

> I would call it stealing, but I hate thieves

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of G Gambill

> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 6:05 PM

> To: ProFoxTech List

> Subject: [NF] Reverse Engineering . Legality

>

> What do you call it (technical name) when a company installs $45,000 worth

> of evaluation software (with a dysfunctional security program to restrict

> functionality and a termination routine that renders the program totally

> non-functional after a set date.) on their computer and reverse engineers

> the software and removes the the evaluation restrictions, without paying for

> it?

>

> Anyone know if this would this be considered a felony?

>

> TIA

>

> George

>

> --

> Success builds confidence. Failure builds knowledge.

>

>

> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

> multipart/alternative

> text/plain (text body -- kept)

> text/html

> ---

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/51DC9A46.5050900@san-dc.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2013 Jeff Johnson