> On 2/1/2013 2:32 PM, Ted Roche wrote:

>> Rick Borup is a fan of Mercurial. He's done some presentations on it. You

>> ought to be able to find them on the Internets.

>>

>> Any distributed version control system (DVCS) like Mercurial, bazaar

>> or git

>> is superior to a client-server model like TFS, CVS or SourceSafe.

>>

>

On 02/01/13 11:52 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:>

> I'm betting the logic/code required/written for such systems is very

> complex. Makes my head hurt just thinking of how to handle all the

> merging! Flat-out replacements are easy, but those merges, ...<shudder>

>

Actually, it's not. Look up some of the Mercurial tutorials to see

exactly how they handle splits and merges. Ted is right.

I've never run Visual SourceSafe (thank god!) nor svn, but I did fire up

Mercurial with the Tortoise UI, and found it quite easy to get running.

(My understanding is that Mozilla uses Mercurial while the Linux folks

use Git.)

IMO, the great advantage of a distributed system like Mercurial or Git

is that you DON'T HAVE ANY 'Team Foundation Server' to administer!

Dan Covill

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/510C5C7D.4060005@san.rr.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.