RE: Need Cosessions

Author: Richard Kaye

Posted: 2012-05-14 at 11:29:29

Sorry if I misled you Jerry. Lantastic's primary product was an inexpensive LAN operating system in the days before network support was ubiquitous. Invisible was a competitor in that space; not remote access. I was just indulging in a bit of nostalgia.

--

rk

-----Original Message-----

From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of jerry foote

Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:00 PM

To: profoxtech@leafe.com

Subject: RE: Need Cosessions

Richard, from what I read It seems like you have to be on site to run the invisa soft, is that your recollection ?

I need to control from Florida (it's in Fresno) Thanks jerry.

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD0441D52D83069@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Richard Kaye