> From: "Jean MAURICE" <jsm.maurice@wanadoo.fr>

> Andrew, I don not think that a where clause can work on a calculated

> field. So

> the correct query is somthing like :

>

>

> SELECT ;

> IIF(EMPTY(natno) OR ninoconfirm = .f.,.t.,.F.) as choose, ;

> natno, ;

> ninoconfirm , ;

> surname ;

> FROM calcpay!employee ;

> WHERE EMPTY(natno) OR ninoconfirm = .f.;

> ORDER BY refn DESC ;

> INTO CURSOR Empinfo READWRITE

Yes. But he could use the name of the calculated field in an having clause !

SELECT ;

IIF(EMPTY(natno) OR ninoconfirm = .f.,.t.,.F.) as choose, ;

natno, ;

ninoconfirm , ;

surname ;

FROM calcpay!employee ;

HAVING choose ;

ORDER BY refn DESC ;

INTO CURSOR Empinfo READWRITE

>

> Working on sunday ??!!!

>

You toooo ?

(famous sound of train whistle) ;o)

Gérard.

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/A539E2EDF18D43689C350B3B2DB6767A@MuriellePC

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.