Hmmm....My first message I sent doesn't seem to have appeared... the one below was a response to it as I addressed it to Grig as opposed to Ken by mistake

Dave

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier

Sent: 30 November 2011 16:10

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: RE: <knock><knock> Testing...

or even Ken!..... damn the old age!

Dave

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Grigore Dolghin

Sent: 30 November 2011 16:01

To: profox@leafe.com

Subject: RE: <knock><knock> Testing...

I have received this message, though. Let's see if you get something back.

:)

-----Original Message-----

From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox)

Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:59 PM

To: profoxtech@leafe.com

Cc: Ed Leafe

Subject: <knock><knock> Testing...

Hmmmmm --- I haven't received a message for several days. Looking at the archives, there is activity, so I guess Ed's server has come to its senses and banned me from the list. It has been a nice run, boys.... <g>

Ken

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/BD031ECABF2B60499200AAB3DBB4A999921BF209@EX-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.