On 11/17/11 09:40, Jarvis, Matthew wrote:

> IIRC correctly it was something of an incomprehensible mess... but then again maybe I just got lost in the details or frustrated that I couldn't get it (the code) to do what I wanted...

>

I forgot to mention that part. <g> Matthew is correct!

Dan Covill

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4EC559AD.7060007@san.rr.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.