Author: Ed Leafe
Posted: 2011-04-18 at 08:15:07
On Apr 18, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Well on say your last post the message header is:
>
> profox-bounces@leafe.com; on behalf of; Ed Leafe [ed@leafe.com]
>
> On Jerry's it is simply:
> Jerry Foote [jerryf@footegroup.com]
>
> without the profox-bounces@leafe.com which our exchange server looks for this to allow it through on the white list.
Here is the header from my previous reply; note that there is no "on behalf of" anywhere in it:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Return-Path: <profox-bounces@leafe.com>
X-Original-To: ed@leafe.com
Delivered-To: ed@leafe.com
Received: from leafe.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by marge.leafe.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B195624CAB6;
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Original-To: profox@leafe.com
Delivered-To: profox@leafe.com
Received: from [192.168.1.200] (cpe-66-66-135-202.rochester.res.rr.com
[66.66.135.202])
by marge.leafe.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9441D24CAB0
for <profox@leafe.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:54:31 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: Profox email question
From: Ed Leafe <ed@leafe.com>
In-Reply-To: <BD031ECABF2B60499200AAB3DBB4A99973581CB8@EX-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:54:30 -0400
Message-Id: <11782973-3846-444F-8A5D-977CCC2F5906@leafe.com>
References: <BD031ECABF2B60499200AAB3DBB4A99973581CB8@EX-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-BeenThere: profox@leafe.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
List-Id: ProFox Email List <profox.leafe.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://leafe.com/mailman/options/profox>,
<mailto:profox-request@leafe.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://leafe.com/pipermail/profox>
List-Post: <mailto:profox@leafe.com>
List-Help: <mailto:profox-request@leafe.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox>,
<mailto:profox-request@leafe.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: profox-bounces@leafe.com
Errors-To: profox-bounces@leafe.com
X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
That means that your mail server or client must be adding that header somehow. You need to examine the raw message headers to see what your whitelist is catching.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/A8DD812B-8839-4B3A-AFBE-1BDA404AC1C9@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.