Re: VFP 9 SP 2 runtimes

Yes, that is what I thought.

Thank you all

Rafael

----- Original Message -----

From: "Dave Crozier" <DaveC@Flexipol.co.uk>

To: <profoxtech@leafe.com>

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:36 AM

Subject: RE: VFP 9 SP 2 runtimes

> Rafael,

> Rick Schummer blogged about SP1 & SP2 and having both on the same PC at:

> ...and Richard is correct, you shouldn't update SP1 to SP2 but install the

> base product then apply SP2. There are certain files that are NOT updated

> to

> the correct revision number due to oversights in the rolling of the SP2

> update.

> Dave Crozier

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

> Of Rafael Copquin

> Sent: 25 August 2009 12:19

> To: profox@leafe.com

> Subject: Re: VFP 9 SP 2 runtimes

> Muito obrigado Eurico

> I understand the written portuguese very well but can't write it at all,

> I'm

> afraid. Mind you, I once translated a portuguese article on VFP for a

> friend

> of mine who didn't have a clue.

> However, thank you for your offer. I just found an old backup CD with the

> file I need, which I had once downloaded but never used.

> BTW, do you know whether, by installing service pack 2 on top of SP1 all

> will run well, or should I uninstall VFP9 altogether and reinstall it with

> SP2 directly?

> Best regards

> Rafael

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: "Eurico Chagas Filho" <echagas.ez@terra.com.br>

> To: <profoxtech@leafe.com>

> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:11 PM

> Subject: RE: VFP 9 SP 2 runtimes

>> Hola Rafael

>> Se quieres puedo enviarte a tu email.

>> El ficheiro tiene 13 mega mas o menos.

>> Sorry, I understand much better then I write.

>> E.

[excessive quoting removed by server]