Author: Gil Hale RR
Posted: 2009-04-14 at 10:10:24
I suppose that if I ran all the "protections" within Vista made available,
and hung my AntiVirus/AntiMalware/AntiAnti apps onto the machine, along with
both a hardware and software firewall that really tightened things down I
could perhaps still be able to read from, and maybe even still write to, the
files on my own local hard drive. Maybe I could even read or play various
CD or DVD media. But would I be able to do anything effective with
connectivity to a network, to include Internet access? I am surmising the
level of "security" has a lot to do with the ability of the machine to do
anything at all, other than open a few local, benign and relatively useless
apps. "It is totally secure, but it does not do anything that could hurt
it. It does not run."
A Windows machine that is so hamstrung that it is indeed "secure", yet can't
be used for much of anything, is not of any value to me. When I run my
Linux and Mac OS X machines I fear nothing, other than the possibility of a
hardware failure. But I keep things backed up on a scheduled basis, so the
exposure to loss of data is at least as minimal as with my Windows based
machines that I keep backed up to an almost insane degree. I trust the
security on my Linux and Mac machines, as it is inherently built into the
very core of the OS, as opposed to the Windows bolt-on, add apps, based
"security solution" afterthought. I still do not trust security on my
Windows machines, despite all the protections I have in place, as I know
something can still sneak into my machinery if I am careless with the web
sites I visit.
I wonder if anyone is going to challenge MS's claim that Vista and W7 are
the most secure OS platforms on the planet. I guess a clever attorney for
MS would say, "He never said which planet, did he?" <g>
Gil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-
> bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:48 AM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: [NF] more secure or less threats?
>
> <http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=4146&tag=nl.e539>
>
> "Secure" is a mindset, and not an actual state, right?
>
> Things change in the industry as well as new threats detected. How
> fast the "vendors" ;-> roll with those threats.
>
> --
> Stephen Russell
> Sr. Production Systems Programmer
> Web and Windows Development
> Independent Contractor
> Memphis TN
>
> 901.246-0159
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]