RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R) New York

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2009-01-27 at 18:29:01

I'm just kidding about the upskirt pictures being ok

*************************************************

1/20/2013 Eviction Notice

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336

--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Geoff Flight <datades@adam.com.au> wrote:

> From: Geoff Flight <datades@adam.com.au>

> Subject: RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R) New York

> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>

> Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 6:03 PM

> Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok.

> Some things are

> just wrong - such as this. The camera sound idea tho is

> just absurd.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com

> [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

> Of Pete Theisen

> Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 9:23 AM

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to

> congressman Peter King (R)

> New York

>

> Michael Madigan wrote:

> > 1. I photograph many times where the sound of a

> camera is inappropriate.

> Concerts, weddings, etc.

> >

> > 2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent

> any laws.

> >

> > 3. What's wrong with upskirt photos? LOL

>

> Hi Michael!

>

> If the skirt wearer has clean underwear on and is not

> recognizable in

> the picture then it is merely tasteless.

> --

> Regards,

>

> Pete

> http://pete-theisen.com/

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2009 Michael Madigan