RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R) New York

Author: Geoff Flight

Posted: 2009-01-27 at 18:22:46

You have an interesting description of 'dictatorship' and 'freedom'. I

believe you were once a doctor. Perhaps you should review the professional

ethics section and see if it gives you any advice on these matters.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Pete Theisen

Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 9:42 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: Re: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R)

New York

Geoff Flight wrote:

> Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok. Some things are

> just wrong - such as this. The camera sound idea tho is just absurd.

Hi Geoff!

Perhaps if you live in a dictatorship such as Australia or anywhere in

the UK, but we have freedom of the press here. Thus, underwear pictures

per se are not banned. It is tasteless, however.

> If the skirt wearer has clean underwear on and is not recognizable in

> the picture then it is merely tasteless.

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2009 Geoff Flight