RE: [OT] Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R) New York

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2009-01-27 at 17:32:36

1. I photograph many times where the sound of a camera is inappropriate. Concerts, weddings, etc.

2. Covering the speaker on the camera will circumvent any laws.

3. What's wrong with upskirt photos? LOL

*************************************************

1/20/2013 Eviction Notice

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336

--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Geoff Flight <datades@adam.com.au> wrote:

> From: Geoff Flight <datades@adam.com.au>

> Subject: RE: Stupid law of the year goes to congressman Peter King (R) New York

> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>

> Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 5:25 PM

> The problem with such laws (and we are just as likely to

> follow suit) is

> that the only people who will circumvent it are the people

> who would misuse

> them anyhow. Its not really a breach of any basic principle

> to ban silent

> cameras but it is however an exercise in futility and

> stupidity.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com

> [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

> Of Paul Hill

> Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 8:50 AM

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: Re: Stupid law of the year goes to congressman

> Peter King (R) New

> York

>

> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Michael Madigan

> <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>

> wrote:

> > The Camera Phone Predator alert act.

> >

> > http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10150671-1.html

>

> What's up Mike? Worried you'll have to give up

> your voyeuristic activities

> :-)

>

> In parts of Asia (Japan?) this is already law. I'm

> sure it's easy to

> circumnavigate with a firmware fix or a pair of wire

> cutters...

>

> --

> Paul

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2009 Michael Madigan