Gee, if you are correct about the Geneva convention responsibility then

the US can't just up and quite Afghanistan or Iraq. I wonder if the

liberals in our country have taken that into consideration?

v/r

=20

//SIGNED//

Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF

6th MDG Data Services Manager

6th MDG Information System Security Officer

Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

Behalf Of Adam Buckland

Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:50 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: RE: [OT] "The world should share the cost" of rebuilding the

Afghanarmy-- McCain from today's speech

Geneva convention which the US is a signatory to says that if you go and

screw up a country in war you have to look after it and get it to a

stable position afterwards, hence the rebuilding of Germany and Japan

after WWII.

So what McCain is saying is basically... The coalition did this in

Afghanistan but everyone else should help pay for it to be cleared

up....

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

Behalf Of MB Software Solutions General Account

Sent: 15 July 2008 17:31

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: [OT] "The world should share the cost" of rebuilding the Afghan

army-- McCain from today's speech

Just heard this. Well I know that the U.S. would probably bear the most

burden on this measure, given the history in Iraq for sure.

Tell me: why must non-Afghan's pay for the increase of Afghanistan's=20

army to 160,000 (instead of the current 80,000)? To my knowledge, no=20

one pays for our army? Let's send food and health aid, but that's where

the dollars should stop, imo.

[excessive quoting removed by server]