Well it hurts the third world which is prevented from

developing.

It causes food prices to go through the roof because

ethanol producers are buying up corn that would

ordinarily go to animal and human feed.

They made the same argument with DDT and millions of

Africans died of malaria as a result.

Finally, slime bags like Al Gore are making BILLIONS

of dollars on phony science.

Why not tell the truth?

Why not say CO2 *MAY* be causing global warming?

Why not use the economic advantage argument for wind

and solar energy?

Why do we have to be lied to?

--- Jerry Wolper <jwolper@swanzoco.com> wrote:

> > So, are mooses, or is it meese, more evil that the

> reprobate SUV

> > manufacturers... or is that OK since it is natural

> and a greater producer

> > of 'greenhouse gases' than the vehicles? I guess

> we will see as time goes

> > on that there are a whole lot more natural reasons

> for climate variation

> > and puny old man.

>

> Of course climate is primarily affected by natural

> causes. There is a

> component, though, that is caused by man, and that's

> the part we can

> do something about.

>

> Even if it turns out not to matter climatologically,

> if we move to

> more environmentally friendly energy, what (besides

> the oil industry)

> does it hurt?

>

> -Jerry Wolper

> jwolper@swanzoco.com

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> Subscription Maintenance:

> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

> OT-free version of this list:

> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

> Searchable Archive:

> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

> This message:

>

http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/46CDC9BE.29488.6524DA@jwolper.swanzoco.com

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,

> are the opinions of the author, and do not

> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement

> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are

> too stupid to see the obvious.

>