Good idea re: having a "sub-species" of judges familiar with (computer)

technology, so competent rulings can be handed down. I would vote for me

<g> (lord help us all <g>)!

Gil

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com

> [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com]On Behalf Of Michael Madigan

> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:14 PM

> To: profoxtech@leafe.com

> Subject: Re: [NF] You RAM is a document?

>

>

> There should be specialized judges for for computer

> technology.

>

> a friend of mine was screwed by a computer-retarded

> judge.

>

>

>

>

> --- Ed Leafe <ed@leafe.com> wrote:

>

> >

> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6190900.html?tag=nl.e550

> >

> > Essentially, this judge has held that the contents

> > of a server's RAM

> > has to be preserved just like any other "document".

> >

> > This sounds almost as clueless as the "internet is

> > a bunch of tubes"

> > moron.

> >

> > -- Ed Leafe

> > -- http://leafe.com

> > -- http://dabodev.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> > Subscription Maintenance:

> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

> > OT-free version of this list:

> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

> > Searchable Archive:

> > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

> > This message:

> >

> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/B058E469-0E13-4236-86F5-5C3

2B9321CA9@leafe.com

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,

> are the opinions of the author, and do not

> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement

> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are

> too stupid to see the obvious.

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]