RE: VFP programmers slow to move

Author: Bill Arnold

Posted: 2001-05-22 at 22:57:57

Randy, somewhere along the line, the concept of a complete DBMS product

development system became synonymous with 'monolithic', where closer to the

truth is that the use of a single, integrated DBMS product development

system that can be used to create all of the different tiers that are needed

is the best approach.

The forces-that-be don't want us to think that way, maybe because there's

lots of money involved, and "churn" is what has been driving this industry

in ridiculous ways.

Bill

> Just found this at BrainBuzz:

>

> Desktop Databases around the Web

>

> The client-server world has been moving toward multi-tier architecture for

> several years. Well, most of it. Visual FoxPro developers have

> been slow to move in that direction.

>

> VFP developers have favored single-tier applications, with all of the

> programming language in one monolithic application. Heck, quite often,

> nearly all of the logic sits behind a single form. VFP is also sometimes

> used as a front-end for a SQL database.

>

> FoxTalk newsletter has an article this month by Craig Berntson. He shows

> readers how to leverage COM+ and become avant garde VFP programmers with

> multi-tier FoxPro applications.

>

> http://www.pinnaclepublishing.com/FT/FTmag.nsf/0/F3465355DA9A62C98

> 5256A48005

> 1ECE8

>

>

> Why don't they just say what they really think? For me, this is not true.

> I've been "moving toward" multi-tier architecture for years, too.

> Talk about

> an over generalization. In my opinion, we are the pioneers of nTier! I

> like to steal the phrase from Intel and say that my apps are

> "nTier Inside"

> as my layers are not always in different languages but inside VFP

> (and based

> on VFE6, I might add, the first true nTier framework for VFP).

> Nevertheless, I can still say it's nTier and I can still "break out" any

> layer at any time into COM components if there were a need. Amazingly,

> there hasn't been much need.

>

> And, why are we being singled out as the "monolithic" group anyway. What

> the @#$@#! do you call Access for crying out loud?!?!

>

> Anyway, Craig's article is excellent, regardless of BrainBuzz's

> intro to it.

>

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Randy Jean, MCP, Integration Services

> Orion Group Software Engineers

> http://www.ogse.com

> rjean@ogse.com

> Fax (via email) - (810) 885-6254

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

©2001 Bill Arnold