I think this may boil down to a difference in our respective definitions

of the word "rich"...

Gary

Michael Madigan wrote:

> Bill Clinton wasn't rich.

>

>

> --- Gary Sutherland <gary@HarrowdenIT.co.uk> wrote:

>

>

>>When can we expect to see free elections in the USA then?

>>

>>The way the present system works only the very rich can possibly stand a

>>chance of becoming president.

>>

>>Gary

>>

>>Michael Madigan wrote:

>>

>>>Pro-Syrian government in Lebanon steps down

>>>Mubarak announces free elections in Egypt

>>>

>>>Looks like the Bush doctrine is working.

>>>

>>>

>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/syria/story/0,13031,1428013,00.html

>>>

>>>http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/213968_egypt01.html

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>=====

>>>USS Jimmy Carter. Isn't it appropriate that the man who torpedoed the US military and economy

>>

>>gets a submarine named after him?

>>

>>>"Liberals believe that the enemy is always right" Michael Savage

>>>

>>>American Red Cross Tsunamis Disaster Relief Fund

>>>http://s1.amazon.com/paypage/PX3BEL97U9A4I/102-6665491-2322525

>>>

>>>Send a care package to a soldier http://www.usocares.org/src/uso_donate.htm

>>>

>>>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]