Author: RSA Forward, eleafe@RSA-NET.COM
Posted: 1999-09-10 at 13:57:21
>Ed, are you implying that it's better to create SCX forms instead of
>form classes? I have a couple layers of form classes, the bottom
>layer being "one-off", as you describe.
No, not at all. In that case, the final item, whether a VCX or an SCX, is
essentially a concrete instance of its superclass. This is different than a
class which has only one subclass, but whose subclass is used in many ways. In
this case, the intermediate level can probably be eliminated with only minor
re-design. Or, for those who use SCX forms, if the superclass of the SCX is used
only for that SCX, then it probably can be eliminated, too, as any class-level
customizations can be simply added to the SCX.
___/
/
__/
/
____/
Ed Leafe