Re: Welcome!

The messages are looking cleaner (read: less clutter) on thislistserv.

Thanks Ed,

Art Bergquist

abergquis@cs.com

In a message dated 7/22/99 4:13:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,

genesis@ionet.net writes:

> I third it. And, thanks Ed. (Boy, this Paul McNett guy justgoesaround

> speaking my mind and all I have to do is ditto...thanks Paul!) < g>

> Michael Copeland

> Genesis Group Software

> mailto:mike.copeland@genesis-group.net

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Paul McNett <pmcnett@garlic.com>

> To: Multiple recipients of profox <profox@leafe.com>

> Date: Thursday, July 22, 1999 3:20 PM

> Subject: Re: Welcome!

> >I agree with Ed. Let the server do server stuff (get thecontenttous)

> >and let the client do the client stuff (sort it all out). Iwasannoyed

> >with every FS message (and the signature too).

> >

> >Thanks Ed for starting this!

> >

> >-Paul

> >

> >On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Ed Leafe wrote:

> >

> >> On 7/22/99 11:44 AM, Spgraves2@aol.com supposedly said:

> >>

> >> >Have you thought about having all message subjects startwithaunique

> 2,3,

> >> >or 4 char string similar to (but different than) "[fs]"?Itwas/is a

> great

> >> >idea, helps us organize our inbox.

> >>

> >> Sure, it's possible, but I personally never caredforthosesorts of

> >> manipulations. Don't most mail clients supportfilingmessagesbased upon

> >> the "From:" or "Reply-To:" fields? Mine is set up tofileanymessages

> >> with "profox@leafe.com" in the Reply-To field intoaseparatefolder.

> >>

> >> ___/

> >> /

> >> __/

> >> /

> >> ____/

> >> Ed Leafe

> >>

> >