Ed:
Seeing some funny misbehavior with the archive, or perhaps people are
reposting old message threads.
When I look at message https://leafe.com/archives/msg/512987 that Mike
posted yesterday, and select the link for "View Entire Thread" the link is:
https://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/512987
But the resulting message is from 2004! That's a long thread, even for us!
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4uhPSg8tKo0CRtcyoFqKX_d+UAXJF_hKKMkBTXmkt_aYw@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Mar 25, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Ted Roche <tedroche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Seeing some funny misbehavior with the archive, or perhaps people are
> reposting old message threads.
>
> When I look at message https://leafe.com/archives/msg/512987 that Mike
> posted yesterday, and select the link for "View Entire Thread" the link is:
>
> https://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/512987
>
> But the resulting message is from 2004! That's a long thread, even for us!
Well, the way a “thread” is determined is by the subject line. That’s because email clients back when that code was written were pretty bad about maintaining threading via the Message-ID and In-Reply-To: headers. So I wrote something that just searches on the subject, with any “Re:”,"[NF]”, or “[OT]” prefixes ignored. So the message with the subject “Your laptop” matches the 2004 message with the subject "RE: [NF] Insure your laptop”, as well as the message from 2006 with the subject "RE: [OT] Just because you can take your laptop into the bathroom..."
It is what it is.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9E9EE8E5-3F3E-464F-8DE9-243E0C3F57F6@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:35 PM Ed Leafe <ed@leafe.com> wrote:
>
> It is what it is.
>
Oh, that's funny. I have been using the archive to refresh my memory since
you posted it, and had never picked up on that before.
Well, don't go changing it now!
Thanks, Ed!
(OK, guys, from now on, I guess we'll have to start each thread with a
unique subject line. Maybe we should add a GUID?)
Kidding, I'm kidding!
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tpBeoGU8KW9fcinhnbwd3J7yu5Ewe7YYLcXQNVNst=_A@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.