I see conversations ongoing in the archives.

I emailed Ed at his leafe.com address several days ago and received

no response.

I'm sending this to see if it arrives in the archive, to rule out the

possibility that leafe.com is failing to accept and deliver any

messages from me.

I suppose if I don't hear from Ed on this in a few days, I'll

unsubscribe from this address, and try an address at a different

domain with a different mail provider.

Ken Dibble

www.stic-cil.org

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Hi, Ken:

Here's the message in the archives: https://leafe.com/archives/msg/511748

and this thread should also show my response, in case you don't get it:

https://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/511748

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Ken Dibble <krdibble@stny.rr.com> wrote:

> I see conversations ongoing in the archives.

>

> I emailed Ed at his leafe.com address several days ago and received no

> response.

>

> I'm sending this to see if it arrives in the archive, to rule out the

> possibility that leafe.com is failing to accept and deliver any messages

> from me.

>

> I suppose if I don't hear from Ed on this in a few days, I'll unsubscribe

> from this address, and try an address at a different domain with a

> different mail provider.

>

> Ken Dibble

> www.stic-cil.org

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4taLnkSfx-dPET0Fn1ptYRj3oqDF5Kw0PYtUZJh2iBDfg@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Folks,

Thanks to those who responded. This pretty clearly seems to be a case

of my email provider suddenly blocking everything coming from

leafe.com. Ed contacted me directly and I am trying to follow up with

the email provider.

In the meantime I'm reading the list in the archives.

Ken Dibble

www.stic-cil.org

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

At 10:19 2018-08-28, Ken Dibble <krdibble@stny.rr.com> wrote:

>Folks,

>

>Thanks to those who responded. This pretty clearly seems to be a

>case of my email provider suddenly blocking everything coming from

>leafe.com. Ed contacted me directly and I am trying to follow up

>with the email provider.

Yuck! I had a similar but reverse case twice with my ISP (two

different ones) botching their USENET setup so that my posts did not

make it out though I saw other people's posts.

Being covertly shut out is not nice.

>In the meantime I'm reading the list in the archives.

You just can not leafe this list alone.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0a6d33d8dae6d86830db237ee232bee6@mtlp000083

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

>In the meantime I'm reading the list in the archives.

You just can not leafe this list alone.

Well, maple* I can, and maple I can't...

But the effort it takes to spoof a direct reply to the listserv

should indicate how much I love ProFox.

Ken

* In honor of Gene's beautiful flag

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

On Aug 29, 2018, at 10:53 AM, Ken Dibble <krdibble@stny.rr.com> wrote:

>

> But the effort it takes to spoof a direct reply to the listserv should indicate how much I love ProFox.

I’d be curious to know what you did with that post. It was received without a Message-ID: header, which means that the link in the footer doesn’t work.

> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

> This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/

-- Ed Leafe

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/F0190228-83E2-4EFD-B8AE-1FE35CC5AC8F@leafe.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

>> But the effort it takes to spoof a direct reply to the listserv

should indicate how much I love

ProFox.

> I'd be curious to know what you did with that post. It was

received without a Message-ID: header,

which means that the link in the footer doesn't work.

Oh, all I did was copy the Subject line and the quoted text from the

archive, inserting greater-thans as appropriate, then sent a fresh

message to ProFox.

More effort than it takes to hit "Reply" in an email client (which is

currently not an option for me), but not that much more, actually...

Ken

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.