Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and additions we could have seen.
Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
For myself I'll start off with:
Native 64bit support
Dave
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725B8CD2D5D247873A2BAF401D4AB2B48BDC55@EX2010-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Laurie Alvey
Posted: 2017-10-20 04:19:03 Link
I guess that would include SQL Server bigint and dot NET longs.
Laurie
On 20 October 2017 at 10:13, Dave Crozier <DaveC@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
> Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the
> realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and
> additions we could have seen.
>
> Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
>
> For myself I'll start off with:
>
> Native 64bit support
>
> Dave
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAMvTR9cgHxKr9b7QQPC4z4DS7m6bxxxuWz5ougNbMkyj-6Z9hQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Vassilis Aggelakos
Posted: 2017-10-20 04:33:02 Link
Multi threading support.
Best Regards
Vassilis Aggelakos
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Laurie Alvey <trukker41@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess that would include SQL Server bigint and dot NET longs.
>
> Laurie
>
> On 20 October 2017 at 10:13, Dave Crozier <DaveC@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the
> > realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and
> > additions we could have seen.
> >
> > Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
> >
> > For myself I'll start off with:
> >
> > Native 64bit support
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACF5tUk01axD2bEOQFXKp7uPd-hhK8qkXOPZU1-0uZx1RP_dUQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Paul Hemans
Posted: 2017-10-20 04:34:07 Link
I would vote for Object Relational Mapping with different database
dialects. See knex.js & Bookshelf.js
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Laurie Alvey <trukker41@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess that would include SQL Server bigint and dot NET longs.
>
> Laurie
>
> On 20 October 2017 at 10:13, Dave Crozier <DaveC@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the
> > realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and
> > additions we could have seen.
> >
> > Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
> >
> > For myself I'll start off with:
> >
> > Native 64bit support
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAKT3oPcQDd=0y-XxBF-XqmwURc_hXLp88h9L9HKJ-cTM89nc3A@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Native runtimes on OS X, Linux and Windows.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Dave Crozier <DaveC@flexipol.co.uk> wrote:
> Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and additions we could have seen.
>
> Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
>
> For myself I'll start off with:
>
> Native 64bit support
>
> Dave
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tGjnHN6Cfg2EzovcRtyHru7hrEGcsUn42Go_ziM5M6TA@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: José Enrique Llopis
Posted: 2017-10-20 06:59:29 Link
64 bits version, integration with WPF,...
Jose Enrique Llopis
-----Mensaje original-----
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] En nombre de Dave Crozier
Enviado el: viernes, 20 de octubre de 2017 11:14
Para: ProFox Email List
Asunto: VFP - What upgrades would VFP10 have had...
Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the
realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and
additions we could have seen.
Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
For myself I'll start off with:
Native 64bit support
Dave
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/D03500A0575844B78475C6D96E201686@LENOVO1
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Kevin J Cully
Posted: 2017-10-20 07:48:45 Link
1. 64bit VFP IDE for access to virtually unlimited RAM
2. 64bit compiled applications
3. Simultanous compilation to multiple target platforms: Linux, Mac, Windows
4. Add the target platform of Web and allow me to cross use business objects I also use in desktop applications.
5. Make it as easy to develop the Web applications as it is easy to develop desktop applications.
6. Add the target of Raspberry Pi as well for their Linux OS distros
7. While we're at it add iOS and Android phone support as a target
8. Strong typing. I'm tired of my own coding errors. Typed issues should be found at compile time, not during testing. That'd save me a ton of time.
9. Keep the database agnostic nature of VFP
10. Keep the reasonable license fee, with unlimited distributions per compiled application.
-Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 5:14 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: VFP - What upgrades would VFP10 have had...
Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and additions we could have seen.
Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
For myself I'll start off with:
Native 64bit support
Dave
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CY4PR09MB2134051FC8BFBC754116885AC5430@CY4PR09MB2134.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Dave Crozier
Posted: 2017-10-20 07:51:20 Link
Sounds to me much like all you've got in Xojo Kevin!!
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kevin J Cully
Sent: 20 October 2017 13:49
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Subject: RE: VFP - What upgrades would VFP10 have had...
1. 64bit VFP IDE for access to virtually unlimited RAM 2. 64bit compiled applications 3. Simultanous compilation to multiple target platforms: Linux, Mac, Windows 4. Add the target platform of Web and allow me to cross use business objects I also use in desktop applications.
5. Make it as easy to develop the Web applications as it is easy to develop desktop applications.
6. Add the target of Raspberry Pi as well for their Linux OS distros 7. While we're at it add iOS and Android phone support as a target 8. Strong typing. I'm tired of my own coding errors. Typed issues should be found at compile time, not during testing. That'd save me a ton of time.
9. Keep the database agnostic nature of VFP 10. Keep the reasonable license fee, with unlimited distributions per compiled application.
-Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 5:14 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: VFP - What upgrades would VFP10 have had...
Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and additions we could have seen.
Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
For myself I'll start off with:
Native 64bit support
Dave
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725B8CD2D5D247873A2BAF401D4AB2B48BEEE9@EX2010-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Jürgen Wondzinski
Posted: 2017-10-20 08:00:02 Link
Hi Kevin,
you basically described Lianja with your wishlist. (Lianja is a SpinOff of
the Recital core, which was a FoxPro Clone on Big-Iron-boxes). They use the
VFP objectmodel, and can use an enhanced VFP-syntax or PHP, Phyton and
Javascript /Typescript (whatever you prefer)
I always coined Lianja as "this would be VFP11, if Microsoft would have been
intelligent enuf"
wOOdy
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Kevin J Cully
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Oktober 2017 14:49
An: ProFox Email List
Betreff: RE: VFP - What upgrades would VFP10 have had...
1. 64bit VFP IDE for access to virtually unlimited RAM
2. 64bit compiled applications
3. Simultanous compilation to multiple target platforms: Linux, Mac, Windows
4. Add the target platform of Web and allow me to cross use business objects
I also use in desktop applications.
5. Make it as easy to develop the Web applications as it is easy to develop
desktop applications.
6. Add the target of Raspberry Pi as well for their Linux OS distros
7. While we're at it add iOS and Android phone support as a target
8. Strong typing. I'm tired of my own coding errors. Typed issues should be
found at compile time, not during testing. That'd save me a ton of time.
9. Keep the database agnostic nature of VFP
10. Keep the reasonable license fee, with unlimited distributions per
compiled application.
-Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 5:14 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: VFP - What upgrades would VFP10 have had...
Alan's comment post regarding VFP not having any upgrades put me in the
realm of thinking that IF VFP development had continued what updates and
additions we could have seen.
Floor open to anyone with useful additions.
For myself I'll start off with:
Native 64bit support
Dave
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009501d349a3$586ece30$094c6a90$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2017-10-20 09:33:21 Link
On 2017-10-20 06:37, Ted Roche wrote:
> Native runtimes on OS X, Linux and Windows.
>
YES!!!!!!! That would be the best, I think, especially given that
Apple/Macs are more prevalent/popular than ever, now.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/99ba2b4e4db59b008cd8f930d3c8223d@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.