Re: "Source not available" -- seems to happen in the history of the list! (workaround found)

Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

Posted: 2017-07-27 14:06:35 Link

I found a workaround. I had a copy of the PJX/PJT from a year ago from

a source code backup. Works now. Bottom line -- I think something

wonky with the Project file. Wonder if that weird quirk could lead to

this wonky "ghosting" behavior they're seeing? It's not consistent

either. Oh well. Onward.

Ugh.

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5b2a75870cdab3fb406fee47b172f061@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

New Search

Re: "Source not available" -- seems to happen in the history of the list! (workaround found)

Author: Fernando D. Bozzo

Posted: 2017-07-27 17:10:10 Link

If the problem was on the PJX, then you could regenerate it from the pj2

text file, so you have a new PJX without any "noise".

The same applies to classlibs and forms, which sometimes have little

corruptions that do not throw errors, but sometimes produce strange

behaviours.

Well, all this just if you use FoxBin2Prg to generate the text files, which

are useful not only for Version Control, but for backup purposes.

2017-07-27 21:06 GMT+02:00 <mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>:

> I found a workaround. I had a copy of the PJX/PJT from a year ago from a

> source code backup. Works now. Bottom line -- I think something wonky

> with the Project file. Wonder if that weird quirk could lead to this wonky

> "ghosting" behavior they're seeing? It's not consistent either. Oh well.

> Onward.

> Ugh.

[excessive quoting removed by server]