Index
2016-12-20 11:13Stephen Russell : [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-20 12:50Ed Leafe : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-20 14:05Stephen Russell : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-20 15:15Ed Leafe : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-20 16:42Stephen Russell : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-21 03:39Man-wai Chang : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-21 04:39Alan Bourke : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-21 05:02AndyHC : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-21 10:38Gene Wirchenko : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
2016-12-21 11:16Ted Roche : Re: [NF] pay for java now?
Back to top
[NF] pay for java now?

Author: Stephen Russell

Posted: 2016-12-20 11:13:27   Link

Oracle never letting us down.

"The database giant is understood to have hired 20 individuals globally

this year, whose sole job is the pursuit of businesses in breach of their

Java licences."

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/16/oracle_targets_java_users_non_compliance/

--

Stephen Russell

Sr. Analyst

Ring Container Technology

Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

multipart/alternative

text/plain (text body -- kept)

text/html

---

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYKuxqG9+P781MPpRuPoQyyE-M9NowSx0e6EWpn_-aKeJw@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Stephen Russell
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Ed Leafe

Posted: 2016-12-20 12:50:16   Link

On Dec 20, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Oracle never letting us down.

>

> "The database giant is understood to have hired 20 individuals globally

> this year, whose sole job is the pursuit of businesses in breach of their

> Java licences."

>

> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/16/oracle_targets_java_users_non_compliance/

That's why I went with Python 15 years ago, even though Java was way more popular at the time. I'll never tie my career to a proprietary product again. My time with VFP taught me that.

-- Ed Leafe

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/D3DBFD67-2F6E-457C-BA5B-C425B0A96F84@leafe.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Ed Leafe
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Stephen Russell

Posted: 2016-12-20 14:05:59   Link

java was OS fifteen years ago just like python. Oracle bought Sun 10 years

ago.

I would agree that for you java is too restrictive in how to program with

it.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Ed Leafe <ed@leafe.com> wrote:

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com>

> wrote:

> >

> > Oracle never letting us down.

> >

> > "The database giant is understood to have hired 20 individuals globally

> > this year, whose sole job is the pursuit of businesses in breach of their

> > Java licences."

> >

> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/16/oracle_targets_

> java_users_non_compliance/

>

> That's why I went with Python 15 years ago, even though Java was way more

> popular at the time. I'll never tie my career to a proprietary product

> again. My time with VFP taught me that.

>

> -- Ed Leafe

>

>

>

>

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYKhtZXhPJ+XqwZ1x9mP=-g72W17WDeOFQaB_Pmi2pvWrA@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Stephen Russell
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Ed Leafe

Posted: 2016-12-20 15:15:40   Link

On Dec 20, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com> wrote:

> java was OS fifteen years ago just like python. Oracle bought Sun 10 years

> ago.

It may have been "open source", but it was never free software. Free software lets you do with it whatever you like. For example, if Oracle somehow bought the Python Software Foundation (not very likely), nothing would prevent you from taking your copy of Python and making your own fork. There is simply zero possibility of it ever becoming tied up by some entity.

"Open source" doesn't mean anything if you can't use that source for your own needs.

-- Ed Leafe

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/8A60D5BA-ED88-46FC-8538-61A3E08C8356@leafe.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Ed Leafe
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Stephen Russell

Posted: 2016-12-20 16:42:58   Link

Our ERP here at work is all in java. RPITA and full of surprises with

respect java version and what will work and what no longer works.

They also do a command line call for all SQL data. I was pretty impressed

with that, to be honest.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Ed Leafe <ed@leafe.com> wrote:

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com>

> wrote:

>

> > java was OS fifteen years ago just like python. Oracle bought Sun 10

> years

> > ago.

>

> It may have been "open source", but it was never free software. Free

> software lets you do with it whatever you like. For example, if Oracle

> somehow bought the Python Software Foundation (not very likely), nothing

> would prevent you from taking your copy of Python and making your own fork.

> There is simply zero possibility of it ever becoming tied up by some entity.

>

> "Open source" doesn't mean anything if you can't use that source for your

> own needs.

>

> -- Ed Leafe

>

>

>

>

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMY+R3gvLMEJQKAp+-0Nf=GZtzYmESZk8NLP=1d-D1ytEkA@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Stephen Russell
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Man-wai Chang

Posted: 2016-12-21 03:39:42   Link

I didn't know there was a Java licence to compile to.... something

like Foxpro distributable? :)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oracle never letting us down.

>

> "The database giant is understood to have hired 20 individuals globally

> this year, whose sole job is the pursuit of businesses in breach of their

> Java licences."

> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/16/oracle_targets_java_users_non_compliance/

--

.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!

/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)

/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw

^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJAOkCKhaLe7DUDNPxvh4uNd+COyEZtaxKdSfwhaVR1t5Q@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Man-wai Chang
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Alan Bourke

Posted: 2016-12-21 04:39:33   Link

For clarity - Java SE remains free for 'general purpose computing' i.e.

desktops, notebooks, smartphones and tablets.

It is not free when embedded in phones, network switches and the like.

The Java SE download contains Java SE, Java SE Advanced Desktop, Java SE

Advanced and Java SE Suite. If you only use Java SE, then you're fine.

If you use one of the other bits, you owe.

One problem is that you can't just download Java SE in isolation. You

have to download the whole shebang and then remove the parts that might

end up getting you charged. Another problem is that if you have to do

big roll-outs you need the advanced installer, and you then owe Oracle.

--

Alan Bourke

alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1482316773.1054546.825770441.0C661572@webmail.messagingengine.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Alan Bourke
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: AndyHC

Posted: 2016-12-21 05:02:31   Link

Isn't most android stuff implemented in Java?

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7868733b-0ac9-e1c2-5b51-fbab51c39bc8@hawthorncottage.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 AndyHC
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Gene Wirchenko

Posted: 2016-12-21 10:38:27   Link

At 02:39 2016-12-21, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm> wrote:

>For clarity - Java SE remains free for 'general purpose computing' i.e.

>desktops, notebooks, smartphones and tablets.

>

>It is not free when embedded in phones, network switches and the like.

Clear as mud.

While I prefer a desktop system, many (and it may be most)

computer users use their phone. How is the majority not general?

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/d1a216e5940962329f3b7e9a3b46a8db@mtlp000087

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Gene Wirchenko
Back to top
Re: [NF] pay for java now?

Author: Ted Roche

Posted: 2016-12-21 11:16:49   Link

Java the language was released as GPL by SUN Microsystems. However

some of the core class libraries and other features were included in

various SDK and JDK and are proprietary and owned by SUN and now

Oracle. Some of these runtimes are called "Java Platform."

There are free alternatives like ClassPath for the core libraries and

IcedTea for the browser applet but the field is littered with

landmines.

Wikipedia attempts to explain it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_(programming_language)

See, especially "Java Platform"

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> wrote:

> At 02:39 2016-12-21, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm> wrote:

>>

>> For clarity - Java SE remains free for 'general purpose computing' i.e.

>> desktops, notebooks, smartphones and tablets.

>>

>> It is not free when embedded in phones, network switches and the like.

>

>

> Clear as mud.

>

> While I prefer a desktop system, many (and it may be most) computer

> users use their phone. How is the majority not general?

>

> [snip]

>

> Sincerely,

>

> Gene Wirchenko

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4t66xpGGOaNhB=YsbzuUZYkGyrsouLmornkKUT83rtR4Q@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2016 Ted Roche