We have a vertical market program that needs encryption and dongles.
So far we are looking at Refox and Chilkat. Which one is better? Is there another we should be looking at.
They want to secure their program with dongles. Any advice?
ThanksWes Wes Wilson, President ERW Custom Programming, Inc. Crescent Lake Plaza
5459 Elizabeth Lake Rd.
Waterford, MI 48327
(248) 683-4182
Visual FoxPro Programmers – Your connection to great Visual FoxPro Programmers
| |
| | | | | |
| Visual FoxPro Programmers – Your connection to great Visual FoxPro ProgrammersYour connection to great Visual FoxPro Programmers |
| |
| View on www.visual-foxpro-programmer.com | Preview by Yahoo |
| |
| |
www.erw.com weswilson@erw.com
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1439747208.1739249.1425315288844.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Wes,
There are good ways to do it without either dongles or encryption simply using VFP. I wrote a class that I think is still on Leafe.com which binds the PC Chip ID along with the Hard Disk ID (Both unique) and then sends out an email to yourselves asking for a password to unlock the software. This password can be a "for life" or a limited time password or in fact a temporary trial password to evaluate the software and all in pure VFP with source code.
I'll see if it is still there and if not then reload it for you if you are interested.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Wes Wilson
Sent: 02 March 2015 16:55
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Encryption and Dongles
We have a vertical market program that needs encryption and dongles.
So far we are looking at Refox and Chilkat. Which one is better? Is there another we should be looking at.
They want to secure their program with dongles. Any advice?
ThanksWes Wes Wilson, President ERW Custom Programming, Inc. Crescent Lake Plaza
5459 Elizabeth Lake Rd.
Waterford, MI 48327
(248) 683-4182
Visual FoxPro Programmers – Your connection to great Visual FoxPro Programmers
| |
| | | | | |
| Visual FoxPro Programmers – Your connection to great Visual FoxPro
| ProgrammersYour connection to great Visual FoxPro Programmers | |
| View on www.visual-foxpro-programmer.com | Preview by Yahoo | |
| |
www.erw.com weswilson@erw.com
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1439747208.1739249.1425315288844.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725B8CD2D5D247873A2BAF401D4AB2468C6529@EX2010-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Wes Wilson wrote on 2015-03-02:
> We have a vertical market program that needs encryption and dongles.
> So far we are looking at Refox and Chilkat. Which one is better? Is there another we should be looking at.
> They want to secure their program with dongles. Any advice?
> ThanksWes
Wes,
ChilKat will assist you with encrypting your data.
ReFox will encrypt the executable.
I have no experience with the ChilKat tools, or the use of security dongles.
Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000801d0550d$c63285c0$52979140$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I agree w/Dave - just you a SW protection scheme instead of a Physical Dongle. Truth be told - if Hackers want to - they can hack anything. Why pay for an overhead expense like a Physical Dongle - because - they can STILL be Hacked! Years ago - the main 3D SW I use - 3DS Max - they used to use Physical Dongles. But, in effect - it was pointless. At one point - they claim on the Internet was that 3DS Max was the MOST Pirated SW in the world. So - obviously - the expense of Dongle proved Fruitless for Autodesk.
Just sayin'...
-K-
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Crozier
Date: Monday, March 2, 2015 11:59 am
Subject: RE: Encryption and Dongles
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Wes,
> There are good ways to do it without either dongles or
> encryption simply using VFP. I wrote a class that I think is
> still on Leafe.com which binds the PC Chip ID along with the
> Hard Disk ID (Both unique) and then sends out an email to
> yourselves asking for a password to unlock the software. This
> password can be a "for life" or a limited time password or in
> fact a temporary trial password to evaluate the software and all
> in pure VFP with source code.
>
> I'll see if it is still there and if not then reload it for you
> if you are interested.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Wes Wilson
> Sent: 02 March 2015 16:55
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: Encryption and Dongles
>
> We have a vertical market program that needs encryption and dongles.
> So far we are looking at Refox and Chilkat. Which one is
> better? Is there another we should be looking at.
> They want to secure their program with dongles. Any advice?
> ThanksWes Wes Wilson, President ERW Custom Programming, Inc.
> Crescent Lake Plaza
> 5459 Elizabeth Lake Rd.
> Waterford, MI 48327
> (248) 683-4182
> Visual FoxPro Programmers – Your connection to great Visual
> FoxPro Programmers
> | |
> | | | | | |
> | Visual FoxPro Programmers – Your connection to great Visual
> FoxPro
> | ProgrammersYour connection to great Visual FoxPro Programmers
> | |
> | View on www.visual-foxpro-programmer.com | Preview by Yahoo | |
> | |
>
>
>
> www.erw.com weswilson@erw.com
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxOT-free version of
> this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1439747208.1739249.1425315288844.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxOT-free version of
> this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the
> opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical
> advice. This statement is added to the messages for those
> lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> Report [OT] Abuse:
> http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/18725B8CD2D5D247873A2BAF401D4AB2468C6529@EX2010-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL
******************
KURT WENDT
Freelance Prototyper
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/e66a8607280b.54f4bb1a@optonline.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.