I am trying to get my browse windows to go full screen when ctrl F10 is
pressed. It used to work, but no more. I am using normal as an
attribute, but I have not used zoom, I don't think. I have heading an
menu off. Not sure about zoom-I can't see the source code now.
Thoughts?
John
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/540A12CE.7020108@americansentry.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Are you sure that CTRL+F10 was not captured by form.keypressed() or
object's keyboard handling?
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:45 AM, John R. Sowden
<jsowden@americansentry.net> wrote:
> I am trying to get my browse windows to go full screen when ctrl F10 is
> pressed. It used to work, but no more. I am using normal as an attribute,
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJC6J6zhrwG8NkYbSp=1eoogg0CjQwBDY9uXu7C8J7wd7Q@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Can you take the CC off as we get 2 of all your posts
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai
Chang
Are you sure that CTRL+F10 was not captured by form.keypressed() or
object's keyboard handling?
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/006901cfca8b$f451f330$dcf5d990$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
According to the email addresses, they are actually two lists (profox
and profoxtech).
profox@leafe.com
profoxtech@leafe.com
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Allen <profox@gatwicksoftware.com> wrote:
> Can you take the CC off as we get 2 of all your posts
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJDwsmoN=2ZVr406_n55fKpce=aHYG8DV8YZau-EAgyFGg@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
And according to my email client your are sending to profoxtech@leafe.com
and cc: to profoxtech@leafe.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai
Chang
Sent: Sunday, 7 September 2014 9:14 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Cc: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: fp dos 2.6 full screen a browse window
According to the email addresses, they are actually two lists (profox and
profoxtech).
profox@leafe.com
profoxtech@leafe.com
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Allen <profox@gatwicksoftware.com> wrote:
> Can you take the CC off as we get 2 of all your posts
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\
http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000501cfca8d$3726c180$a5744480$@ozemail.com.au
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
You should only need to send to profox, the headers OT etc sort out the rest
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai
Chang
Sent: 07 September 2014 13:14
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Cc: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: fp dos 2.6 full screen a browse window
According to the email addresses, they are actually two lists (profox
and profoxtech).
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/006d01cfca8f$11462ee0$33d28ca0$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I just hit <Reply All>, and did NOT deliberately send to both lists.
Was the list manager auto-magically add a "CC:" clause to all Profox messages?
If nobody inserted a "CC:" clause, my <Reply All> would not have used it.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Darren <foxdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> And according to my email client your are sending to profoxtech@leafe.com
> and cc: to profoxtech@leafe.com
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJDZsXeY=m+PrhqLVLYsXkAsmOEVmALL0mWpunZzieYZxQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
My understanding ... <Reply All> is the issue - simply <Reply> is
sufficient.
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Man-wai
Chang
Sent: Sunday, 7 September 2014 9:48 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Cc: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: fp dos 2.6 full screen a browse window
I just hit <Reply All>, and did NOT deliberately send to both lists.
Was the list manager auto-magically add a "CC:" clause to all Profox
messages?
If nobody inserted a "CC:" clause, my <Reply All> would not have used it.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Darren <foxdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> And according to my email client your are sending to
> profoxtech@leafe.com and cc: to profoxtech@leafe.com
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\
http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000301cfca94$9cfcd6a0$d6f683e0$@ozemail.com.au
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Under any of the NT kernel lineage (NT, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8) it's not
DOS, for a start. It's CMD.EXE, which happens to support MS-DOS
commands.
Secondly the ability to run CMD.EXE in a fullscreen 'text mode' of the
graphic adapter has not been there since XP. So the best you can do is
size the window up to fill the screen.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1410092740.1601416.164579333.6D946949@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
In other words, drivers adhering to the Windows Display Driver Model
used from Vista onwards cannot support these text-only VGA modes.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014, at 01:25 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
> Under any of the NT kernel lineage (NT, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8) it's not
> DOS, for a start. It's CMD.EXE, which happens to support MS-DOS
> commands.
>
> Secondly the ability to run CMD.EXE in a fullscreen 'text mode' of the
> graphic adapter has not been there since XP. So the best you can do is
> size the window up to fill the screen.
>
> --
> Alan Bourke
> alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1410093154.1602814.164580489.4645B452@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.