Anyone seeing my mails twice?
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1401299008.8104.122560733.26445FE4@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Just the other Allen/Alan/Allan
I suspect he just hit the pub early.
Looks fine to me.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm>wrote:
> Anyone seeing my mails twice?
>
> --
> Alan Bourke
> alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tJBa3GYw-BJ+vYPivYKLUrb1XwPi7h-+yrYWk0PRCc9w@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Only when I drink
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:50 PM, Ted Roche <tedroche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Just the other Allen/Alan/Allan
>
>I suspect he just hit the pub early.
>
>Looks fine to me.
>
>
>On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm>wrote:
>
>> Anyone seeing my mails twice?
>>
>> --
>> Alan Bourke
>> alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>>
>[excessive quoting removed by server]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tJBa3GYw-BJ+vYPivYKLUrb1XwPi7h-+yrYWk0PRCc9w@mail.gmail.com
>
>** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
>
>
>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1401300265.457.YahooMailNeo@web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-28 13:04:30 Link
Maybe he's already been hitting the pints. :-)
On 2014-05-28 13:50, Ted Roche wrote:
> Just the other Allen/Alan/Allan
>
> I suspect he just hit the pub early.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Alan Bourke
> <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm>wrote:
>
>> Anyone seeing my mails twice?
>>
>> --
>> Alan Bourke
>> alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/571c17ae1f4547f79a43f3cdbb5f2db8@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Am I the only one then? Weird. Only wine, no pints.
Al (Allen)
-----Original Message-----
Only when I drink
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:50 PM, Ted Roche <tedroche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Just the other Allen/Alan/Allan
>
>I suspect he just hit the pub early.
>
>Looks fine to me.
>
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004001cf7aa6$9849ffe0$c8ddffa0$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Allen wrote on 2014-05-28:
> Am I the only one then? Weird. Only wine, no pints.
> Al (Allen)
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Only when I drink
>
> On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:50 PM, Ted Roche <tedroche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Just the other Allen/Alan/Allan
>>
>> I suspect he just hit the pub early.
>>
>> Looks fine to me.
>>
>
Allen,
Proof in the history?
http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/493446
Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000f01cf7aaa$705dacd0$51190670$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 28/05/2014 02:56 PM, Allen wrote:
> Am I the only one then? Weird. Only wine, no pints.
> Al (Allen)
>
I don't see any double posts. Didn't you ask this in the NF section the
other day and somebody suggested that the person was using Reply All
rather than Reply and that Reply All goes to ProFox as well as
ProfoxTech? I only get Profoxtech messages, so maybe that is the issue
you are seeing?
--
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/53863867.8010103@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Twas ME that suggested he might have been doing Reply to All!
And - if you Only get ProFoxTech - you would Still be getting Both
messages.
-K-
On 5/28/2014 3:26 PM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
> On 28/05/2014 02:56 PM, Allen wrote:
>> Am I the only one then? Weird. Only wine, no pints.
>> Al (Allen)
>>
>
> I don't see any double posts. Didn't you ask this in the NF section
> the other day and somebody suggested that the person was using Reply
> All rather than Reply and that Reply All goes to ProFox as well as
> ProfoxTech? I only get Profoxtech messages, so maybe that is the
> issue you are seeing?
>
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/538639A4.3060105@optonline.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
That's all I get too. And for some reason it's just Alan I get double posts
from. And its only just started too which I can't figure out.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Cazabon
Sent: 28 May 2014 21:27
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Ddoouubbllee Poossttiinngg
On 28/05/2014 02:56 PM, Allen wrote:
> Am I the only one then? Weird. Only wine, no pints.
> Al (Allen)
>
I don't see any double posts. Didn't you ask this in the NF section the
other day and somebody suggested that the person was using Reply All rather
than Reply and that Reply All goes to ProFox as well as ProfoxTech? I only
get Profoxtech messages, so maybe that is the issue you are seeing?
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004101cf7aac$26545ba0$72fd12e0$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-28 14:37:56 Link
On 2014-05-28 15:24, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> Allen,
>
> Proof in the history?
> http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/493446
If he does a reply-all to profox@leafe.com AND profoxtech@leafe.com,
wouldn't that exhibit what you saw?
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b8adc56cffa0ea777d6d2f4a96a884f2@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.