Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-17 16:14:02 Link
I developed my app on Win7; works great. I move it to an older WinXP
computer for some not-my-machine testing...it fails with an Error 1691
on the SET LIBRARY TO VFPEncryption71.fll line. I researched the error
and found this on Craig's site:
http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/spsblog/2009/08/09/MajorVFPEncryptionUpdate.aspx
'If you are getting a "FLL is Invalid" error when running either of
these FLLs it is because you are missing the runtimes on the system you
are deploying your application on. What about the previous
vfpencryption.fll that used the VC++ 8.0 runtimes? I continue to update
to the latest Visual Studio (10.0 will be next) and I suggest you do the
same. Most VFP developers are using the vfpencryption71.fll as the C
runtime matches the one used for VFP 9.0 (msvcr71.dll) and it provides
the exact same functionality as vfpencryption.fll.'
I just went and downloaded the latest onto the test machine....same
error.
My VFP runtime files are right there in the application's folder, which
is c:\MBSS\FabMate, along with the latest VFPEncryption71.fll.
Ideas?
tia,
--Mike
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0d5d6b8f0f65bf5a297c20dc56be7aac@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-18 12:14:36 Link
Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have
lives, but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this
one). :-)
On 2014-05-17 17:14, mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I developed my app on Win7; works great. I move it to an older WinXP
> computer for some not-my-machine testing...it fails with an Error 1691
> on the SET LIBRARY TO VFPEncryption71.fll line. I researched the
> error and found this on Craig's site:
> http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/spsblog/2009/08/09/MajorVFPEncryptionUpdate.aspx
>
> 'If you are getting a "FLL is Invalid" error when running either of
> these FLLs it is because you are missing the runtimes on the system
> you are deploying your application on. What about the previous
> vfpencryption.fll that used the VC++ 8.0 runtimes? I continue to
> update to the latest Visual Studio (10.0 will be next) and I suggest
> you do the same. Most VFP developers are using the vfpencryption71.fll
> as the C runtime matches the one used for VFP 9.0 (msvcr71.dll) and it
> provides the exact same functionality as vfpencryption.fll.'
>
> I just went and downloaded the latest onto the test machine....same
> error.
>
> My VFP runtime files are right there in the application's folder,
> which is c:\MBSS\FabMate, along with the latest VFPEncryption71.fll.
>
> Ideas?
>
> tia,
> --Mike
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3a0ef253d1b71d3b919bf4001423fe89@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Allen
Posted: 2014-05-18 12:47:52 Link
There are 2 dll's for C++ so make sure you have them both. VFP for some
reason only sends one out.
Al
-----Original Message-----
Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have lives,
but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). :-)
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003601cf72c1$4b792980$e26b7c80$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-18 12:52:18 Link
msvcr71.dll and what's the other one?
On 2014-05-18 13:47, Allen wrote:
> There are 2 dll's for C++ so make sure you have them both. VFP for
> some
> reason only sends one out.
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have
> lives,
> but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one).
> :-)
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b7badfdb5e47afe3938e014e1db6dd1f@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Tracy Pearson
Posted: 2014-05-18 12:56:40 Link
On May 18, 2014 1:52:18 PM EDT, mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
msvcr71.dll and what's the other one?
On 2014-05-18 13:47, Allen wrote:
> There are 2 dll's for C++ so make sure you have them both. VFP for
> some
> reason only sends one out.
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have
> lives,
> but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one).
> :-)
>
>
Mike,
Load the FLL into this tool. It will tell you what is needed.
http://www.dependencywalker.com/
--
Tracy
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c7c2a934-7cb3-443e-94b5-bf95eed7512a@email.android.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-18 13:14:21 Link
On 2014-05-18 13:56, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Load the FLL into this tool. It will tell you what is needed.
> http://www.dependencywalker.com/
Thanks, Tracy!
Looks like MSVCP71.DLL is what I'm missing. The other messages in bold
red...makes me wonder if I'll have an issue besides this?
Here's the screenshot of the error messages:
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/images/dependency_for_vfpencryption71.png
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9246e5fbd9a82f817432369bbacac787@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Allen
Posted: 2014-05-18 13:24:59 Link
Think you're ok. Just copy the missing file over
Al
-----Original Message-----
Thanks, Tracy!
Looks like MSVCP71.DLL is what I'm missing. The other messages in bold
red...makes me wonder if I'll have an issue besides this?
Here's the screenshot of the error messages:
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/images/dependency_for_vfpencryption71.png
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000001cf72c6$7aaec980$700c5c80$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2014-05-18 13:30:56 Link
Yep, just copying the MSVCP71.DLL into the app folder fixed it.
THANKS A TON, LADS!!!
On 2014-05-18 14:24, Allen wrote:
> Think you're ok. Just copy the missing file over
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
>
> Thanks, Tracy!
>
> Looks like MSVCP71.DLL is what I'm missing. The other messages in bold
> red...makes me wonder if I'll have an issue besides this?
>
> Here's the screenshot of the error messages:
> http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/images/dependency_for_vfpencryption71.png
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b88b0186d726ee38f087b604008ef671@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Richard Kaye
Posted: 2014-05-19 07:45:10 Link
I know you've figured out the missing DLL but in addition to the last SP2 hotfix I also keep a vintage copy of the MS C++ runtime installer around. Having the 2 DLLs in the same folder with the VFP runtimes works, of course, but the installer can also come in handy at times.
--
rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:15 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have lives, but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). :-)
On 2014-05-17 17:14, mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I developed my app on Win7; works great. I move it to an older WinXP
> computer for some not-my-machine testing...it fails with an Error 1691
> on the SET LIBRARY TO VFPEncryption71.fll line. I researched the
> error and found this on Craig's site:
> http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/spsblog/2009/08/09/MajorVFPEncrypti
> onUpdate.aspx
>
> 'If you are getting a "FLL is Invalid" error when running either of
> these FLLs it is because you are missing the runtimes on the system
> you are deploying your application on. What about the previous
> vfpencryption.fll that used the VC++ 8.0 runtimes? I continue to
> update to the latest Visual Studio (10.0 will be next) and I suggest
> you do the same. Most VFP developers are using the vfpencryption71.fll
> as the C runtime matches the one used for VFP 9.0 (msvcr71.dll) and it
> provides the exact same functionality as vfpencryption.fll.'
>
> I just went and downloaded the latest onto the test machine....same
> error.
>
> My VFP runtime files are right there in the application's folder,
> which is c:\MBSS\FabMate, along with the latest VFPEncryption71.fll.
>
> Ideas?
>
> tia,
> --Mike
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD044239A3F7892@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.