Hi,
I am struggling trying to get blat to work via my Godaddy mail server.
In Thunderbird my settings to send email are:
Server: smtpout.secureserver.net
Port: 465
Connection Security: SSL/TLS
I have stunnel.conf setup like this:
[ssmtp]
accept = 465
connect = smtpout.secureserver.net:465
My code runs blat with the server = localhost and port = 465
In the stunnel UI I see this:
2014.01.26 10:40:13 LOG5[7884:3096]: Service [ssmtp] accepted connection
from 127.0.0.1:50405
2014.01.26 10:40:43 LOG3[7884:3096]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected
2014.01.26 10:40:43 LOG5[7884:3096]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to
SSL, 0 byte(s) sent to socket
Is there something I have not added to the stunnel.conf to tell it to
use SSL/TLS?
--
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/52E521F6.6040104@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 1/26/14 6:55 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am struggling trying to get blat to work via my Godaddy mail server. In
> Thunderbird my settings to send email are:
>
> Server: smtpout.secureserver.net
> Port: 465
> Connection Security: SSL/TLS
>
> I have stunnel.conf setup like this:
>
> [ssmtp]
> accept = 465
> connect = smtpout.secureserver.net:465
>
> My code runs blat with the server = localhost and port = 465
>
> In the stunnel UI I see this:
>
> 2014.01.26 10:40:13 LOG5[7884:3096]: Service [ssmtp] accepted connection from
> 127.0.0.1:50405
> 2014.01.26 10:40:43 LOG3[7884:3096]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected
> 2014.01.26 10:40:43 LOG5[7884:3096]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to SSL, 0
> byte(s) sent to socket
>
> Is there something I have not added to the stunnel.conf to tell it to use SSL/TLS?
This article looks like it may help you. Just substitute "blat" for "mutt".
http://www.dawoodfall.net/index.php/en/relaying-sendmail-a-ssl
Paul
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/52E52A12.5010305@ulmcnett.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 26/01/2014 11:30 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
>
> This article looks like it may help you. Just substitute "blat" for "mutt".
>
> http://www.dawoodfall.net/index.php/en/relaying-sendmail-a-ssl
>
>
Thank, but that looks like exactly what I have done in terms of the
setup but I'm not getting through with it.
--
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/52E558F1.7050009@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Frank Cazabon <frank.cazabon@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Thank, but that looks like exactly what I have done in terms of the setup
> but I'm not getting through with it.
>
>
You may get more help tomorrow when the regular subscribers check in. I
don't use stunnel, but blat is drop dead simple, so I'd suspect it's a
configuration problem on the stunnel side. You could probably test with a
terminal program to see if you're getting access to the mail server,
something like:
telnet 127.0.0.1:465
and you should see an 'EHLO' response from the mail server.
Your blat needs to be configured to email to your local end of the tunnel,
likely something like is show in this article:
http://www.jeffkastner.com/2010/01/blat-stunnel-and-gmail/
Note that he shows separate install steps and then a send step.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4uDmVArB5EhXa3pRcbHYx+8PRUE+en9Eah=d8i2FxPHnw@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 27 January 2014 13:17, Frank Cazabon wrote:
>
> Is there something I have not added to the stunnel.conf to tell it to
> use SSL/TLS?
>
>
Hi Frank,
Try adding logging to your stunnel.conf file:
debug = 7
output = stunnel.log
And under "; Service-level configuration" I have:
protocol=smtp
[ssmtp]
accept = 127.0.0.1:251
connect = smtp.gmail.com:587
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
G.
PS: Here's an article I wrote for the August 2008 VFUG Newsletter, "VFP,
Gmail and Me":
http://www.vfug.org/Newsletters/Newsletters2.Afp?!_3Y40EXCJ9Date=08/31/2008#gb1
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPUo4G6XG8hqLJLTx39ngNuy8HODusZj3rAi9CJ9-RN9bR3pTw@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I have an app which is running on several machines which uses CDO to send
emails automatically. It worked fine until a few months ago when I got a
message on a development machine saying CDO.CONFIGURATION class could not be
found, the other development machine and the client's machines were working
fine. I put up an appeal for help on ProFox and got the very sensible reply
from Ted that it had probably been broken by M$ and that I should use BLAT.
Unfortunately BLAT as it stands won't work with Gmail which is what the
clients are using so I decided to let the world go by as it was only one
machine. Unfortunately one of the client machines has developed the same
fault so now I have to do something :-)
I've done some research and it appears that I have to use Stunnel with BLAT
to overcome the Secure SMTP issue with Gmail. I believe I need to install
Stunnel on a development machine then all I need to do is copy the files
from the Program files area and put them in the same folder as my exe on the
client's machine. I then need to call Stunnel before I call BLAT.
Unfortunately Stunnel installs a raft of files and I'm not sure which ones I
need nor can I see what I should do to call Stunnel.
I am a bit lost (a lot lost?) in this whole area of SMTP, SSL, etc and am
floundering! Can anyone help me with this problem?
Thanks
John
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004301cf5282$654a2da0$2fde88e0$@johnweller.co.uk
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Hi John,
There is another open source SMTP application out there similar to Blat and it supposedly supports TLS/SSL type connections. I don't recall the name off the top of my head and am too buried at the moment to dig it up but I'm sure a search of the Profox archives will turn up the mention.
--
rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of John Weller
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 12:57 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Stunnel
I have an app which is running on several machines which uses CDO to send emails automatically. It worked fine until a few months ago when I got a message on a development machine saying CDO.CONFIGURATION class could not be found, the other development machine and the client's machines were working fine. I put up an appeal for help on ProFox and got the very sensible reply from Ted that it had probably been broken by M$ and that I should use BLAT.
Unfortunately BLAT as it stands won't work with Gmail which is what the clients are using so I decided to let the world go by as it was only one machine. Unfortunately one of the client machines has developed the same fault so now I have to do something :-)
I've done some research and it appears that I have to use Stunnel with BLAT to overcome the Secure SMTP issue with Gmail. I believe I need to install Stunnel on a development machine then all I need to do is copy the files from the Program files area and put them in the same folder as my exe on the client's machine. I then need to call Stunnel before I call BLAT.
Unfortunately Stunnel installs a raft of files and I'm not sure which ones I need nor can I see what I should do to call Stunnel.
I am a bit lost (a lot lost?) in this whole area of SMTP, SSL, etc and am floundering! Can anyone help me with this problem?
Thanks
John
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD04422A73C3E0A@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Is this it? http://leafe.com/archives/msg/486657
On 2014-04-07 14:25, Richard Kaye wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> There is another open source SMTP application out there similar to
> Blat and it supposedly supports TLS/SSL type connections. I don't
> recall the name off the top of my head and am too buried at the moment
> to dig it up but I'm sure a search of the Profox archives will turn up
> the mention.
>
> --
> rk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> John Weller
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 12:57 PM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: Stunnel
>
> I have an app which is running on several machines which uses CDO to
> send emails automatically. It worked fine until a few months ago when
> I got a message on a development machine saying CDO.CONFIGURATION
> class could not be found, the other development machine and the
> client's machines were working fine. I put up an appeal for help on
> ProFox and got the very sensible reply from Ted that it had probably
> been broken by M$ and that I should use BLAT.
> Unfortunately BLAT as it stands won't work with Gmail which is what
> the clients are using so I decided to let the world go by as it was
> only one machine. Unfortunately one of the client machines has
> developed the same fault so now I have to do something :-)
>
> I've done some research and it appears that I have to use Stunnel with
> BLAT to overcome the Secure SMTP issue with Gmail. I believe I need
> to install Stunnel on a development machine then all I need to do is
> copy the files from the Program files area and put them in the same
> folder as my exe on the client's machine. I then need to call Stunnel
> before I call BLAT.
> Unfortunately Stunnel installs a raft of files and I'm not sure which
> ones I need nor can I see what I should do to call Stunnel.
>
> I am a bit lost (a lot lost?) in this whole area of SMTP, SSL, etc and
> am floundering! Can anyone help me with this problem?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ca29bf896baa32fc21d0a6de5941c956@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Did I write that? Who knew... <g>
I guess that must be what I was thinking of.
--
rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 5:33 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Stunnel
Is this it? http://leafe.com/archives/msg/486657
On 2014-04-07 14:25, Richard Kaye wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> There is another open source SMTP application out there similar to
> Blat and it supposedly supports TLS/SSL type connections. I don't
> recall the name off the top of my head and am too buried at the moment
> to dig it up but I'm sure a search of the Profox archives will turn up
> the mention.
>
> --
> rk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> John Weller
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 12:57 PM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: Stunnel
>
> I have an app which is running on several machines which uses CDO to
> send emails automatically. It worked fine until a few months ago when
> I got a message on a development machine saying CDO.CONFIGURATION
> class could not be found, the other development machine and the
> client's machines were working fine. I put up an appeal for help on
> ProFox and got the very sensible reply from Ted that it had probably
> been broken by M$ and that I should use BLAT.
> Unfortunately BLAT as it stands won't work with Gmail which is what
> the clients are using so I decided to let the world go by as it was
> only one machine. Unfortunately one of the client machines has
> developed the same fault so now I have to do something :-)
>
> I've done some research and it appears that I have to use Stunnel with
> BLAT to overcome the Secure SMTP issue with Gmail. I believe I need
> to install Stunnel on a development machine then all I need to do is
> copy the files from the Program files area and put them in the same
> folder as my exe on the client's machine. I then need to call Stunnel
> before I call BLAT.
> Unfortunately Stunnel installs a raft of files and I'm not sure which
> ones I need nor can I see what I should do to call Stunnel.
>
> I am a bit lost (a lot lost?) in this whole area of SMTP, SSL, etc and
> am floundering! Can anyone help me with this problem?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD04422A73C3F9D@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I found this link which uses CDO and a script to use Gmail.
VBScript To Send Email Using CDO -
PaulSadowski.com<http://www.paulsadowski.com/wsh/cdo.htm>
Laurie
On 7 April 2014 22:32, <mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> Is this it? http://leafe.com/archives/msg/486657
>
>
> On 2014-04-07 14:25, Richard Kaye wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> There is another open source SMTP application out there similar to
>> Blat and it supposedly supports TLS/SSL type connections. I don't
>> recall the name off the top of my head and am too buried at the moment
>> to dig it up but I'm sure a search of the Profox archives will turn up
>> the mention.
>>
>> --
>> rk
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of John
>> Weller
>> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 12:57 PM
>> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
>> Subject: Stunnel
>>
>> I have an app which is running on several machines which uses CDO to
>> send emails automatically. It worked fine until a few months ago when
>> I got a message on a development machine saying CDO.CONFIGURATION
>> class could not be found, the other development machine and the
>> client's machines were working fine. I put up an appeal for help on
>> ProFox and got the very sensible reply from Ted that it had probably
>> been broken by M$ and that I should use BLAT.
>> Unfortunately BLAT as it stands won't work with Gmail which is what
>> the clients are using so I decided to let the world go by as it was
>> only one machine. Unfortunately one of the client machines has
>> developed the same fault so now I have to do something :-)
>>
>> I've done some research and it appears that I have to use Stunnel with
>> BLAT to overcome the Secure SMTP issue with Gmail. I believe I need
>> to install Stunnel on a development machine then all I need to do is
>> copy the files from the Program files area and put them in the same
>> folder as my exe on the client's machine. I then need to call Stunnel
>> before I call BLAT.
>> Unfortunately Stunnel installs a raft of files and I'm not sure which
>> ones I need nor can I see what I should do to call Stunnel.
>>
>> I am a bit lost (a lot lost?) in this whole area of SMTP, SSL, etc and
>> am floundering! Can anyone help me with this problem?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> John
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAMvTR9eQW6aF+G6gr3TZJrxfb1Z6NtUHwEVZVg-bpnqkZkEzxg@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.