Author: <kamcginnis@gmail.com>
Posted: 2013-01-31 21:32:09 Link
Too bad Dr Dave is not still in charge of Fox. The guy was a genius. He
would have it running on everything so we would not be stuck with the M$
crap.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalmada@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
I use to use FoxBase on a sco xenix system. It worked great!!!! You could
run your foxpro programs from multiple locations via remote connections by
loggin into the unix type environment.
David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalmada@sbcglobal.net Phone: 619-295-5535
San Diego, California - Databases: FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access
Data Translation - Information Extraction - Migrating Applications
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:30 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
We have a XP machines that we connect to several printers and scanners
including a bank check scanner. They work great. When they break someday, we
will replace them with XP machines. We are stopping with XP. Vista and all
that other Microcrap OS is garbage. That company is living on Bill Gates'
monopoly. They are throwing it away slowly but surely. It is unfortunate
that there is no way to run VFP on Linux. We would jump immediately.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalmada@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
I use a Brother MFC-7345N and the scanning multiple pages worked great and
loads the software automatically when I used Vista.
But
When I use Windows 7 the software doesn't load automatically and I can only
do one page scan at a time.
I was on the phone with brother for hours and they were not able to fix
this.
David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalmada@sbcglobal.net Phone: 619-295-5535
San Diego, California - Databases: FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access
Data Translation - Information Extraction - Migrating Applications
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:59 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
Also Amazon and Costco.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jharvey@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
Thanks for the feedback, I believe our local Staples store sells Brother
equipment, I'll check out their offerings...
James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:56 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
We have 2 brother multifunction MFC 8460N I am sure this is outdated now,
but they work great. We have no plans to change. We use the software that
came with it. OmniPage. I think we did upgrade the software in the past 3 or
4 years. I recommend the Brother brand - low cost and reliable. We use the
auto document sheet feeder a lot and it never fails (as long as you remember
to remove the staples)
In the past we have had 2 Canon printer/scanners and the auto document feed
broke on both. Canon refused to fix it even though they were still under the
1 year warrantee. We will never buy anything with a Canon brand again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jharvey@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:31 AM
Subject: [NF] Fast scanner
The company is considering scanning documents at our horse sale next
November, and we are looking for a fast scanner with a small footprint.
Fujitsu has the ScanSnap series, and they look reasonable. The models in
this line have a 20-25 ppm speed, which seems fast.
It would be nice to have a model that allows you to name the individual
scans and send them to a specified folder.
I was wondering if anyone has had experience with the Fujitsu models, or
other brands.
James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/894A8B2B2E3D4AA39E95016F2282E662@stratfordsoftware.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Yep,
SCO xenix was a cool O/S especially when you had a host of dumb terminals attached serially. We used to run our dev system on an ALTOS 4 box with 20Mb hard drive (That was MASSIVE at the time) and 8 inch floppies. As well as that we used to develop systems using the OASIS operating system that had a database actually built into the O/S.
Happy days!
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: 01 February 2013 03:32
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fox on other OS, (was Fast scanner)
Too bad Dr Dave is not still in charge of Fox. The guy was a genius. He would have it running on everything so we would not be stuck with the M$ crap.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalmada@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
I use to use FoxBase on a sco xenix system. It worked great!!!! You could
run your foxpro programs from multiple locations via remote connections by
loggin into the unix type environment.
David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalmada@sbcglobal.net Phone: 619-295-5535
San Diego, California - Databases: FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access
Data Translation - Information Extraction - Migrating Applications
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:30 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
We have a XP machines that we connect to several printers and scanners
including a bank check scanner. They work great. When they break someday, we
will replace them with XP machines. We are stopping with XP. Vista and all
that other Microcrap OS is garbage. That company is living on Bill Gates'
monopoly. They are throwing it away slowly but surely. It is unfortunate
that there is no way to run VFP on Linux. We would jump immediately.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalmada@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
I use a Brother MFC-7345N and the scanning multiple pages worked great and
loads the software automatically when I used Vista.
But
When I use Windows 7 the software doesn't load automatically and I can only
do one page scan at a time.
I was on the phone with brother for hours and they were not able to fix
this.
David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalmada@sbcglobal.net Phone: 619-295-5535
San Diego, California - Databases: FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access
Data Translation - Information Extraction - Migrating Applications
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:59 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
Also Amazon and Costco.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jharvey@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
Thanks for the feedback, I believe our local Staples store sells Brother
equipment, I'll check out their offerings...
James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:56 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
We have 2 brother multifunction MFC 8460N I am sure this is outdated now,
but they work great. We have no plans to change. We use the software that
came with it. OmniPage. I think we did upgrade the software in the past 3 or
4 years. I recommend the Brother brand - low cost and reliable. We use the
auto document sheet feeder a lot and it never fails (as long as you remember
to remove the staples)
In the past we have had 2 Canon printer/scanners and the auto document feed
broke on both. Canon refused to fix it even though they were still under the
1 year warrantee. We will never buy anything with a Canon brand again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jharvey@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:31 AM
Subject: [NF] Fast scanner
The company is considering scanning documents at our horse sale next
November, and we are looking for a fast scanner with a small footprint.
Fujitsu has the ScanSnap series, and they look reasonable. The models in
this line have a 20-25 ppm speed, which seems fast.
It would be nice to have a model that allows you to name the individual
scans and send them to a specified folder.
I was wondering if anyone has had experience with the Fujitsu models, or
other brands.
James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/BD031ECABF2B60499200AAB3DBB4A999012BAC39E9@EX-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013, at 02:30 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Yep,
> SCO xenix was a cool O/S especially when you had a host of dumb terminals
> attached serially.
I remember brief scrapes with FoxPro on that, in the early 90s. Arcane
even then.
Also much fun with Concurrent DOS / MultiUser DOS / DR DOS on machines
with 16 terminals hanging off big external serial port blocks.
Nightmare.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1359731455.24520.140661185551801.17966FD2@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Dbman was my favorite on SCO, (another dbase/fox clone) multi platform..
I could develop in dos, deploy multi user in sco xenix . same code.. almost
any os of the time (late 80s and 90') one could run dbman on it..
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/msg00871.html
Those were the days..
Bob Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Crozier
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:31 AM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] Fox on other OS, (was Fast scanner)
Yep,
SCO xenix was a cool O/S especially when you had a host of dumb terminals
attached serially. We used to run our dev system on an ALTOS 4 box with 20Mb
hard drive (That was MASSIVE at the time) and 8 inch floppies. As well as
that we used to develop systems using the OASIS operating system that had a
database actually built into the O/S.
Happy days!
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: 01 February 2013 03:32
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fox on other OS, (was Fast scanner)
Too bad Dr Dave is not still in charge of Fox. The guy was a genius. He
would have it running on everything so we would not be stuck with the M$
crap.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalmada@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
I use to use FoxBase on a sco xenix system. It worked great!!!! You could
run your foxpro programs from multiple locations via remote connections by
loggin into the unix type environment.
David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalmada@sbcglobal.net Phone: 619-295-5535
San Diego, California - Databases: FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access Data Translation
- Information Extraction - Migrating Applications
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:30 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
We have a XP machines that we connect to several printers and scanners
including a bank check scanner. They work great. When they break someday, we
will replace them with XP machines. We are stopping with XP. Vista and all
that other Microcrap OS is garbage. That company is living on Bill Gates'
monopoly. They are throwing it away slowly but surely. It is unfortunate
that there is no way to run VFP on Linux. We would jump immediately.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Almada" <davidalmada@sbcglobal.net>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
I use a Brother MFC-7345N and the scanning multiple pages worked great and
loads the software automatically when I used Vista.
But
When I use Windows 7 the software doesn't load automatically and I can only
do one page scan at a time.
I was on the phone with brother for hours and they were not able to fix
this.
David Almada Consulting
Email: davidalmada@sbcglobal.net Phone: 619-295-5535
San Diego, California - Databases: FoxPro/SQL/MS-Access Data Translation
- Information Extraction - Migrating Applications
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:59 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
Also Amazon and Costco.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jharvey@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [NF] Fast scanner
Thanks for the feedback, I believe our local Staples store sells Brother
equipment, I'll check out their offerings...
James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
kamcginnis@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:56 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [NF] Fast scanner
We have 2 brother multifunction MFC 8460N I am sure this is outdated now,
but they work great. We have no plans to change. We use the software that
came with it. OmniPage. I think we did upgrade the software in the past 3 or
4 years. I recommend the Brother brand - low cost and reliable. We use the
auto document sheet feeder a lot and it never fails (as long as you remember
to remove the staples)
In the past we have had 2 Canon printer/scanners and the auto document feed
broke on both. Canon refused to fix it even though they were still under the
1 year warrantee. We will never buy anything with a Canon brand again.
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Harvey" <jharvey@hanoverpa.com>
To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:31 AM
Subject: [NF] Fast scanner
The company is considering scanning documents at our horse sale next
November, and we are looking for a fast scanner with a small footprint.
Fujitsu has the ScanSnap series, and they look reasonable. The models in
this line have a 20-25 ppm speed, which seems fast.
It would be nice to have a model that allows you to name the individual
scans and send them to a specified folder.
I was wondering if anyone has had experience with the Fujitsu models, or
other brands.
James E Harvey
M.I.S.
Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc.
www.hanoverpa.com
office: 717-637-8931
cell: 717-887-2565
fax: 717-637-6766
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003f01ce0098$82ec3430$88c49c90$@1amsoftware.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: MB Software Solutions, LLC
Posted: 2013-02-01 11:16:32 Link
On 2/1/2013 11:23 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
> Dbman was my favorite on SCO, (another dbase/fox clone) multi platform..
> I could develop in dos, deploy multi user in sco xenix . same code.. almost
> any os of the time (late 80s and 90') one could run dbman on it..
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/msg00871.html
>
> Those were the days..
> Bob Lee
Such a great achievement, and so ahead of its time. Did this trend
discontinue simply because M$ wanted to dominate the OS world and hence
not want their softwares to run on non-Windows machines?
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/510BF870.3000702@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Stephen Russell
Posted: 2013-02-01 11:34:32 Link
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:16 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2/1/2013 11:23 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
>
>> Dbman was my favorite on SCO, (another dbase/fox clone) multi platform..
>> I could develop in dos, deploy multi user in sco xenix . same code..
>> almost
>> any os of the time (late 80s and 90') one could run dbman on it..
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/**linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/**msg00871.html<http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/msg00871.html>
>>
>> Those were the days..
>> Bob Lee
>>
>
>
> Such a great achievement, and so ahead of its time. Did this trend
> discontinue simply because M$ wanted to dominate the OS world and hence not
> want their softwares to run on non-Windows machines?--------------------
>
At that time M$ financials all ran off of ??? SCO I believe.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN
901.246-0159 cell
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJpbwTyRkEDDE0mroVmuDXmE4D-i0YQt+PR36GCbHuJhg@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: MB Software Solutions, LLC
Posted: 2013-02-01 11:49:56 Link
On 2/1/2013 12:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:16 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/1/2013 11:23 AM, Bob Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Dbman was my favorite on SCO, (another dbase/fox clone) multi platform..
>>> I could develop in dos, deploy multi user in sco xenix . same code..
>>> almost
>>> any os of the time (late 80s and 90') one could run dbman on it..
>>>
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/**linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/**msg00871.html<http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-apps@vger.rutgers.edu/msg00871.html>
>>>
>>> Those were the days..
>>> Bob Lee
>>>
>>
>>
>> Such a great achievement, and so ahead of its time. Did this trend
>> discontinue simply because M$ wanted to dominate the OS world and hence not
>> want their softwares to run on non-Windows machines?--------------------
>>
>
> At that time M$ financials all ran off of ??? SCO I believe.
>
>
That reminds me of the SCO lawsuits awhile back. Remember that? I
don't think anything came of that, did it? Just bluster and saber rattling.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/510C0044.8080300@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> Such a great achievement, and so ahead of its time. Did this trend
> discontinue simply because M$ wanted to dominate the OS world and
> hence not want their softwares to run on non-Windows machines?
More because M$ dominated the OS world, and cross-platform
development is difficult. If you want to go back to the early '80s,
Lotus supplanted VisiCorp in the spreadsheet market because VisiCalc
only ran on the Apple II, while 1-2-3 ran on DOS.
Of course, as Microsoft acquired various software companies (like our
friends at Fox Software), they had a vested interest in making sure
their products only ran on Microsoft OSs.
-Jerry
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/510BFD36.32018.14370C@jwolper.swanzoco.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 2/1/13 2:36 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
> More because M$ dominated the OS world, and cross-platform
> development is difficult.
Cross-platform development doesn't need to be difficult. All the apps I've developed
in the past 8 years have run on Linux, Mac, and Windows. Even if they only ever get
used on Windows, I make 'em cross-platform anyway because it comes for free.
I guess we may have different meanings of 'difficult', though. I like things simple,
so I code using the terminal and vim. I would find an IDE like Eclipse or Visual
Studio extremely difficult to use, and my productivity would tank.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/510C4913.7090708@ulmcnett.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox)
Posted: 2013-02-04 14:15:16 Link
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Paul McNett <p@ulmcnett.com> wrote:
> Eclipse or Visual
> Studio extremely difficult to use, and my productivity would tank.
>
Gee, I found Eclipse to be incredibly daunting, too. Too much so for me to
bother with. I thought it was just another example of the deterioration of
the stuff between my ears, since "everybody" (not here) seemed to rave
about it.
Nice to know that you (obviously with no such deterioration) found it that
way, too.
Ken
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFyV=LkZQYfUbMeG=0xcY0DuzTLaPNut_0+rPjM912Uue4Q7jA@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.