The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing
President Obama for a second term:
#-------------------------------------
Excerpt:
For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President
Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory
will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that
Americans need.
or
#-------------------------------------
Regards,
LelandJ
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/508E8575.9000909@mail.smvfp.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 10/29/2012 09:32 AM, lelandj wrote:
> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing
> President Obama for a second term:
Hi Leland,
Good as in panders to your prejudices? Not a word about the
lying-through-his-teeth on Benghazi, which should, by itself insure his
defeat and impeachment. Never mind the economic depression that is going
on throughout the US with the possible exception of your house that he
simply does not see and therefore doesn't exist.
Then all HIS racist dog whistling . . .
Drugs, Leland, you need drugs . . .
--
Regards,
Pete
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/508E8C2F.7050704@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 10/29/2012 09:01 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 09:32 AM, lelandj wrote:
>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing
>> President Obama for a second term:
>
> Hi Leland,
>
> Good as in panders to your prejudices? Not a word about the
> lying-through-his-teeth on Benghazi, which should, by itself insure
> his defeat and impeachment. Never mind the economic depression that is
> going on throughout the US with the possible exception of your house
> that he simply does not see and therefore doesn't exist.
>
> Then all HIS racist dog whistling . . .
>
> Drugs, Leland, you need drugs . . .
>
The truth is a real bitch, Pete, when you're the pits of denial. LOL
Regards,
LelandJ
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/508E9D89.4030407@mail.smvfp.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President Obama for a second term:
>
> #-------------------------------------
> Excerpt:
>
> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.
>
>
> or
>
>
> #-------------------------------------
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/033CD131-E886-48E9-95DF-F28B0DE80129@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
That's a rhetorical question. LOL Time for Tia Chi. Be back soon.
Regards,
LelandJ
On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
> Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?
>
>
> Michael Oke, II
> 661-349-6221
>
> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>
>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President Obama for a second term:
>>
>> #-------------------------------------
>> Excerpt:
>>
>> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.
>>
>>
>> or
>>
>>
>> #-------------------------------------
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/508E9F7D.10503@mail.smvfp.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
No, it's an honest question but you may not know.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:23, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
> That's a rhetorical question. LOL Time for Tia Chi. Be back soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
>
> On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
>> Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?
>>
>>
>> Michael Oke, II
>> 661-349-6221
>>
>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President Obama for a second term:
>>>
>>> #-------------------------------------
>>> Excerpt:
>>>
>>> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.
>>>
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/8f2c8xx
>>>
>>> #-------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> LelandJ
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/6109ACEB-7B81-499C-86DE-528AE54F2C09@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Would it surprise you that every candidate supported by the times since 1960
has been a democrat.
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Oke, II
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 10:24 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Barack Obama for Re-election
No, it's an honest question but you may not know.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated
recipient.
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:23, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
> That's a rhetorical question. LOL Time for Tia Chi. Be back soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
>
> On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
>> Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?
>>
>>
>> Michael Oke, II
>> 661-349-6221
>>
>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated
recipient.
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing
President Obama for a second term:
>>>
>>> #-------------------------------------
>>> Excerpt:
>>>
>>> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President
Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will
be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans
need.
>>>
>>>
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obama-for-president.
html?pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121028
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/8f2c8xx
>>>
>>> #-------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> LelandJ
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3E8F92C0CA6D4D0C9283CEDA9B704E3E@jerryfootePC
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Maybe you should google it?
That is, unless you are paying Leland to do your research.
El 29/10/12 12:24, Michael Oke, II escribió:
> No, it's an honest question but you may not know.
>
>
> Michael Oke, II
> 661-349-6221
>
> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:23, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>
>> That's a rhetorical question. LOL Time for Tia Chi. Be back soon.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
>>> Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael Oke, II
>>> 661-349-6221
>>>
>>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President Obama for a second term:
>>>>
>>>> #-------------------------------------
>>>> Excerpt:
>>>>
>>>> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8f2c8xx
>>>>
>>>> #-------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> LelandJ
>>>>
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/508EA5F0.5070009@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Comedy gold
----- Original Message -----
From: lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:32 AM
Subject: [OT] Barack Obama for Re-election
The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President Obama for a second term:
#-------------------------------------
Excerpt:
For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.
or
#-------------------------------------
Regards,
LelandJ
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1351527258.81826.YahooMailNeo@web122303.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Back to sleep Ricardo, the adults are talking now.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:51, Ricardo Aráoz <ricaraoz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe you should google it?
> That is, unless you are paying Leland to do your research.
>
>
> El 29/10/12 12:24, Michael Oke, II escribió:
>> No, it's an honest question but you may not know.
>>
>>
>> Michael Oke, II
>> 661-349-6221
>>
>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:23, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That's a rhetorical question. LOL Time for Tia Chi. Be back soon.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> LelandJ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
>>>> Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michael Oke, II
>>>> 661-349-6221
>>>>
>>>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President Obama for a second term:
>>>>>
>>>>> #-------------------------------------
>>>>> Excerpt:
>>>>>
>>>>> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8f2c8xx
>>>>>
>>>>> #-------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> LelandJ
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5A2018FF-1027-4935-A759-0F48461478D3@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.