Hi Everybody,
Geez!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/31/jury-reaches-verdict-in-edwards-trial/
--
Regards,
Pete
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4FC8AD7D.60800@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
Michael Oke, II
okeind@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Pete Theisen <petetheisen@verizon.net>wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> Geez!
>
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/31/jury-reaches-verdict-in-edwards-trial/
> --
> Regards,
>
> Pete
> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACBEV=U=W0V3i5EYVQ55t=Jn4Z9Sd+TLnZ10iguSGQgogWVO0g@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: MB Software Solutions, LLC
Posted: 2012-06-01 12:51:38 Link
On 6/1/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
What he did was wrong, if I heard correctly, since he spent campaign
dollars on hush/extortion money. Oh wait...the campaign dollars were in
this pile, and the pile NEXT to it was what he used for his baby momma.
Oh.....
Still makes you wonder (since he got off) how much tax payer $$$$$ was
wasted.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4FC9012A.4010408@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
He was being tried on the basis of intent. In other words the jury had to
determine his intent which is a nebulous concept. How can anyone ever figure
out the intent of any other person? No one can get into the head of another.
So the jury took a pass.
----- Original Message -----
From: "MB Software Solutions, LLC"
<mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
> On 6/1/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
>
>
> What he did was wrong, if I heard correctly, since he spent campaign
> dollars on hush/extortion money. Oh wait...the campaign dollars were in
> this pile, and the pile NEXT to it was what he used for his baby momma.
> Oh.....
>
> Still makes you wonder (since he got off) how much tax payer $$$$$ was
> wasted.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7A83EAD58D414A4CA1DADD1A8C439ED4@dual
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
The prosecution did a terrible job. John Edwards had the best lawyers money could buy and the government used government slugs to prosecute him.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
He was being tried on the basis of intent. In other words the jury had to
determine his intent which is a nebulous concept. How can anyone ever figure
out the intent of any other person? No one can get into the head of another.
So the jury took a pass.
----- Original Message -----
From: "MB Software Solutions, LLC"
<mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
> On 6/1/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
>
>
> What he did was wrong, if I heard correctly, since he spent campaign
> dollars on hush/extortion money. Oh wait...the campaign dollars were in
> this pile, and the pile NEXT to it was what he used for his baby momma.
> Oh.....
>
> Still makes you wonder (since he got off) how much tax payer $$$$$ was[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1338887288.78302.YahooMailNeo@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Maybe so but they had a terrible case to prove.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Madigan" <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
The prosecution did a terrible job. John Edwards had the best lawyers money
could buy and the government used government slugs to prosecute him.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
He was being tried on the basis of intent. In other words the jury had to
determine his intent which is a nebulous concept. How can anyone ever figure
out the intent of any other person? No one can get into the head of another.
So the jury took a pass.
----- Original Message -----
From: "MB Software Solutions, LLC"
<mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
> On 6/1/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
>
>
> What he did was wrong, if I heard correctly, since he spent campaign
> dollars on hush/extortion money. Oh wait...the campaign dollars were in
> this pile, and the pile NEXT to it was what he used for his baby momma.
> Oh.....
>
> Still makes you wonder (since he got off) how much tax payer $$$$$
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/C4222810EE7545FE82B2E3B21C526ADA@dual
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
They're going to have to rewrite the laws. Of course Bunny Mellon gave him the cash for the campaign. Do you think they went to her and said, "John knocked up his mistress, can we have a million dollars to keep the whore quiet?".
________________________________
From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
Maybe so but they had a terrible case to prove.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Madigan" <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
The prosecution did a terrible job. John Edwards had the best lawyers money
could buy and the government used government slugs to prosecute him.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
He was being tried on the basis of intent. In other words the jury had to
determine his intent which is a nebulous concept. How can anyone ever figure
out the intent of any other person? No one can get into the head of another.
So the jury took a pass.
----- Original Message -----
From: "MB Software Solutions, LLC"
<mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
> On 6/1/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
>
>
> What he did was wrong, if I heard correctly, since he spent campaign
> dollars on hush/extortion money. Oh wait...the campaign dollars were in
> this pile, and the pile NEXT to it was what he used for his baby momma.
> Oh.....
>
> Still makes you wonder (since he got off) how much tax payer $$$$$
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/C4222810EE7545FE82B2E3B21C526ADA@dual
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1338921243.72862.YahooMailNeo@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if they did just that.
Michael Oke, II
okeind@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Michael Madigan <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>wrote:
> They're going to have to rewrite the laws. Of course Bunny Mellon gave
> him the cash for the campaign. Do you think they went to her and said,
> "John knocked up his mistress, can we have a million dollars to keep the
> whore quiet?".
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>
> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 9:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
>
> Maybe so but they had a terrible case to prove.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Madigan" <mmadi10699@yahoo.com>
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
>
>
> The prosecution did a terrible job. John Edwards had the best lawyers money
> could buy and the government used government slugs to prosecute him.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>
> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
>
> He was being tried on the basis of intent. In other words the jury had to
> determine his intent which is a nebulous concept. How can anyone ever
> figure
> out the intent of any other person? No one can get into the head of
> another.
> So the jury took a pass.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "MB Software Solutions, LLC"
> <mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com>
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 1:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] Jimmy Carter's new assistant?
>
>
> > On 6/1/2012 10:58 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> >> It was a waste of time and money to ever try him in the first place.
> >
> >
> > What he did was wrong, if I heard correctly, since he spent campaign
> > dollars on hush/extortion money. Oh wait...the campaign dollars were in
> > this pile, and the pile NEXT to it was what he used for his baby momma.
> > Oh.....
> >
> > Still makes you wonder (since he got off) how much tax payer $$$$$
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACBEV=XOqaPo52yTREqAwEp1MVUgVZLx6GaAMwkK1FyqvGQb4Q@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.