Index
2012-03-16 10:33Pete Theisen : [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-17 16:55geoff : RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-17 19:08Pete Theisen : Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-17 23:45geoff : RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-18 00:20Michael Oke, II : Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-18 00:23Michael Madigan : Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-18 17:00Ricardo Araoz : Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-18 17:04Michael Madigan : Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-18 17:42Ricardo Araoz : Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
2012-03-18 18:09geoff : RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
Back to top
[OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Pete Theisen

Posted: 2012-03-16 10:33:29   Link

Hi Everybody,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis.

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F635D49.5090600@gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Pete Theisen
Back to top
RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: geoff

Posted: 2012-03-17 16:55:49   Link

I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being

impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who has

literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish have human

rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate president - if indeed

ever.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Pete Theisen

Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:03 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Hi Everybody,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis.

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000901cd0488$b70f9ed0$252edc70$@com.au

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 geoff
Back to top
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Pete Theisen

Posted: 2012-03-17 19:08:53   Link

geoff wrote:

> I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being

> impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who has

> literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish have human

> rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate president - if indeed

> ever.

Hi Geoff,

As a matter of fact, we still support Bush. Much rather have Bush be an

unofficial ambassador than, say, Carter - yet Carter is the one who

usurps the role.

Bush was at times inarticulate, Bammer is something else. Inexplicable,

I think - or worse, suspect.

Is the movie already out in Oz?

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

> Of Pete Theisen

> Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:03 AM

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>

> Hi Everybody,

>

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

>

> Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis.

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F652795.1050100@verizon.net

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Pete Theisen
Back to top
RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: geoff

Posted: 2012-03-17 23:45:20   Link

while avoiding the politics since to be honest, i dont care that much, Bush

was ALWAYS inarticulate and Obama is in fact a great orator. saying

something of substance is always a different manner. but i had a desk

calendar full of Bushisms. politics aside, he was a terrible, truly awful

public speaker.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Pete Theisen

Sent: Sunday, 18 March 2012 10:39 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

geoff wrote:

> I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being

> impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who

> has literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish

> have human rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate

> president - if indeed ever.

Hi Geoff,

As a matter of fact, we still support Bush. Much rather have Bush be an

unofficial ambassador than, say, Carter - yet Carter is the one who usurps

the role.

Bush was at times inarticulate, Bammer is something else. Inexplicable, I

think - or worse, suspect.

Is the movie already out in Oz?

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

> Behalf Of Pete Theisen

> Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:03 AM

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>

> Hi Everybody,

>

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

>

> Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis.

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000001cd04c1$ec95ec60$c5c1c520$@com.au

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 geoff
Back to top
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Michael Oke, II

Posted: 2012-03-18 00:20:41   Link

Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list.

Michael Oke, II

661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.

On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:45 PM, "geoff" <datades@adam.com.au> wrote:

> while avoiding the politics since to be honest, i dont care that much, Bush

> was ALWAYS inarticulate and Obama is in fact a great orator. saying

> something of substance is always a different manner. but i had a desk

> calendar full of Bushisms. politics aside, he was a terrible, truly awful

> public speaker.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

> Of Pete Theisen

> Sent: Sunday, 18 March 2012 10:39 AM

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>

> geoff wrote:

>> I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being

>> impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who

>> has literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish

>> have human rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate

>> president - if indeed ever.

>

> Hi Geoff,

>

> As a matter of fact, we still support Bush. Much rather have Bush be an

> unofficial ambassador than, say, Carter - yet Carter is the one who usurps

> the role.

>

> Bush was at times inarticulate, Bammer is something else. Inexplicable, I

> think - or worse, suspect.

>

> Is the movie already out in Oz?

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

>> Behalf Of Pete Theisen

>> Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:03 AM

>> To: ProFox Email List

>> Subject: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>>

>> Hi Everybody,

>>

>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

>>

>> Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis.

>

>

> --

> Regards,

>

> Pete

> http://pete-theisen.com/

> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/25565104-2EEC-42B0-B95D-6FF5C568E477@gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Michael Oke, II
Back to top
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2012-03-18 00:23:46   Link

Listen to Obama speak without a teleprompter and he's mediocre at best.  

----- Original Message -----

From: geoff <datades@adam.com.au>

To: 'ProFox Email List' <profox@leafe.com>

Cc:

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 12:45 AM

Subject: RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

while avoiding the politics since to be honest, i dont care that much, Bush

was ALWAYS inarticulate and Obama is in fact a great orator. saying

something of substance is always a different manner. but i had a desk

calendar full of Bushisms. politics aside, he was a terrible, truly awful

public speaker.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Pete Theisen

Sent: Sunday, 18 March 2012 10:39 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

geoff wrote:

> I had to say it before someone else does. You criticise Obama as being

> impossible to understand while being one-time supporters of GWB who

> has literally a desk-calendar full of mangled statements like 'fish

> have human rights too'? there has rarely been a less articulate

> president - if indeed ever.

Hi Geoff,

As a matter of fact, we still support Bush. Much rather have Bush be an

unofficial ambassador than, say, Carter - yet Carter is the one who usurps

the role.

Bush was at times inarticulate, Bammer is something else. Inexplicable, I

think - or worse, suspect.

Is the movie already out in Oz?

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

> Behalf Of Pete Theisen

> Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:03 AM

> To: ProFox Email List

> Subject: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>

> Hi Everybody,

>

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

>

> Coming to a theater soon - an expansion of this thesis.

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

h[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1332048226.53913.YahooMailNeo@web125602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Michael Madigan
Back to top
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Ricardo Araoz

Posted: 2012-03-18 17:00:25   Link

El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió:

> Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list.

>

>

> Michael Oke, II

> 661-349-6221

Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter?

Un B Fucking Lievable!!!

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F665AF9.1080403@gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Ricardo Araoz
Back to top
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2012-03-18 17:04:22   Link

Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else.  

He book, "Dreams of My Father", was written by someone else.   

He's a fraud. 

________________________________

From: Ricardo Araoz <ricaraoz@gmail.com>

To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>

Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:00 PM

Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió:

> Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average.  When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list.

>

>

> Michael Oke, II

> 661-349-6221

Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter?

Un B Fucking Lievable!!!

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F665AF9.1080403@gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

multipart/alternative

text/plain (text body -- kept)

text/html

---

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1332108262.88151.YahooMailNeo@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Michael Madigan
Back to top
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: Ricardo Araoz

Posted: 2012-03-18 17:42:15   Link

El 18/03/12 19:04, Michael Madigan escribió:

> Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else.

>

> He book, "Dreams of My Father", was written by someone else.

>

> He's a fraud.

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: Ricardo Araoz <ricaraoz@gmail.com>

> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>

> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:00 PM

> Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>

> El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió:

>> Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list.

>>

>>

>> Michael Oke, II

>> 661-349-6221

> Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter?

>

> Un B Fucking Lievable!!!

Is it me?

Are you *actually* answering my post? Or do you just go on with your

rant regardless?

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F6664C7.3030307@gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Ricardo Araoz
Back to top
RE: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

Author: geoff

Posted: 2012-03-18 18:09:16   Link

the point is that all things being equal... (and they are) Obama is a superb

orator and GWB was so bad, he is now the STANDARD in bad. both had

teleprompters, both had other people write their speeches.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Ricardo Araoz

Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 9:12 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

El 18/03/12 19:04, Michael Madigan escribió:

> Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else.

>

> He book, "Dreams of My Father", was written by someone else.

>

> He's a fraud.

>

>

> ________________________________

> From: Ricardo Araoz <ricaraoz@gmail.com>

> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>

> Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:00 PM

> Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand

>

> El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió:

>> Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer

away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are

counted, his name won't be on the list.

>>

>>

>> Michael Oke, II

>> 661-349-6221

> Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter?

>

> Un B Fucking Lievable!!!

Is it me?

Are you *actually* answering my post? Or do you just go on with your rant

regardless?

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000c01cd055c$24152cb0$6c3f8610$@com.au

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 geoff