So you want to develop SW for robots?
<http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html>
--
Stephen Russell
901.246-0159 cell
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJ8WL_dYdbXS5UVWk1OqV0yxssngB_48FLpHZMi=+1itw@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
They are giving away one of the robots during the pycon closing session. I have a 1 in 2257 chance.
On Mar 9, 2012, at 14:58, Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com> wrote:
> So you want to develop SW for robots?
>
> <http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Russell
>
> 901.246-0159 cell
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/E04A7CF2-056E-45A3-A264-C0D15E7CFB76@ulmcnett.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> So you want to develop SW for robots?
>
> <http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html>
PyCon opened up this morning with a dance exhibition of those robots, choreographed entirely in Python. I'm uploading a short clip I took right now, so if the video isn't available right away, try again later: http://youtu.be/M74EZcOPogg
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DCEFCC02-37E7-4601-914C-804EF5B7CE38@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> So you want to develop SW for robots?
>>
>> <http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html>
>
> PyCon opened up this morning with a dance exhibition of those robots, choreographed entirely in Python. I'm uploading a short clip I took right now, so if the video isn't available right away, try again later: http://youtu.be/M74EZcOPogg
>
Hi Ed,
Cool. Nice that you thought to film it. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F5AE375.8040503@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Call me when they start programming this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbFFs4DHWys
________________________________
From: Pete Theisen <petetheisen@verizon.net>
To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [NF] this looks interesting
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> So you want to develop SW for robots?
>>
>> <http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html>
>
> PyCon opened up this morning with a dance exhibition of those robots, choreographed entirely in Python. I'm uploading a short clip I took right now, so if the video isn't available right away, try again later: http://youtu.be/M74EZcOPogg
>
Hi Ed,
Cool. Nice that you thought to film it. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F5AE375.8040503@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1331366502.92260.YahooMailNeo@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Call me when they start programming this one.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbFFs4DHWys
Hi Michael,
That may be more of a humanoid than a robot. Not much need for such a
thing, really. Ugly machines cost less and do more work.
The significance of robots is that they do the work of humans, making
more leisure possible for humans. Problem will be in getting away from
the work model for distributing the goods of society.
When there is little or no work, but plenty of goods - how do you
distribute the goods? The most to the biggest assholes?
>>> So you want to develop SW for robots?
>>>
>>> <http://www.aldebaran-robotics.com/en/Solutions/For-Development/developer-program.html>
>> PyCon opened up this morning with a dance exhibition of those robots, choreographed entirely in Python. I'm uploading a short clip I took right now, so if the video isn't available right away, try again later: http://youtu.be/M74EZcOPogg
> Cool. Nice that you thought to film it. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F5B0F73.8070109@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Maybe they are working towards robot wives Pete.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Theisen
That may be more of a humanoid than a robot. Not much need for such a
thing, really. Ugly machines cost less and do more work.
The significance of robots is that they do the work of humans, making
more leisure possible for humans. Problem will be in getting away from
the work model for distributing the goods of society.
When there is little or no work, but plenty of goods - how do you
distribute the goods? The most to the biggest assholes?
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3C9DA660F07A4B95B1ABC448C0076075@gslredacer
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Robot wives, and then version 10.0 Female Robot makes you take out the garbage and wash the dishes.
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen <profox@gatwicksoftware.com>
To: profox@leafe.com
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [NF] this looks interesting
Maybe they are working towards robot wives Pete.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Theisen
That may be more of a humanoid than a robot. Not much need for such a
thing, really. Ugly machines cost less and do more work.
The significance of robots is that they do the work of humans, making
more leisure possible for humans. Problem will be in getting away from
the work model for distributing the goods of society.
When there is little or no work, but plenty of goods - how do you
distribute the goods? The most to the biggest assholes?
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3C9DA660F07A4B95B1ABC448C0076075@gslredacer
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1331375835.82368.YahooMailNeo@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Allen wrote:
> Maybe they are working towards robot wives Pete.
Hi Al,
How this would be that different from most "real" women?
Not only that, with ugly robots doing all the "real" work, both men and
women would have more time to devote toward getting along with each
other - or not.
> That may be more of a humanoid than a robot. Not much need for such a
> thing, really. Ugly machines cost less and do more work.
>
> The significance of robots is that they do the work of humans, making
> more leisure possible for humans. Problem will be in getting away from
> the work model for distributing the goods of society.
>
> When there is little or no work, but plenty of goods - how do you
> distribute the goods? The most to the biggest assholes?
--
Regards,
Pete
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F5B6870.60505@verizon.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Come on - we all know - if they can finally make robots move REALLY
Well, like humans - and animate them to look really Lifelike - its not
for the purposes of doing manual labor - but, instead - for usage in the
Oldest Human Profession. Need I say more?
What I found strange in that video is that they did NOT show the legs of
the woman robot - as I suspect they do NOT look like normal legs - since
we still can do that yet and produce proper mobility!
-K-
On 3/10/2012 3:38 AM, Allen wrote:
> Maybe they are working towards robot wives Pete.
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Theisen
>
> That may be more of a humanoid than a robot. Not much need for such a
> thing, really. Ugly machines cost less and do more work.
>
> The significance of robots is that they do the work of humans, making
> more leisure possible for humans. Problem will be in getting away from
> the work model for distributing the goods of society.
>
> When there is little or no work, but plenty of goods - how do you
> distribute the goods? The most to the biggest assholes?
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4F5B7B47.5080106@optonline.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.