Index
2012-01-29 22:47Nicholas Geti : [OT] Early Puritans' experiment with communism
2012-01-30 09:58Stephen Russell : Re: [OT] Early Puritans' experiment with communism
Back to top
[OT] Early Puritans' experiment with communism

Author: Nicholas Geti

Posted: 2012-01-29 22:47:21   Link

http://www.garynorth.com/puritan_economic_experiments.pdf

Read page 6 of this document describing the failure of their first experiment in common ownership of land and goods. It didn't work then and isn't working now. The young men refused to work the fields and the women thought dressing meat and washing clothes for the common good was nothing more than slavery. Once land was distributed and each family could work their own property, harvests were bountiful.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

multipart/alternative

text/plain (text body -- kept)

text/html

---

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CDE2B2963FE64539BE00073757F525EE@dual

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Nicholas Geti
Back to top
Re: [OT] Early Puritans' experiment with communism

Author: Stephen Russell

Posted: 2012-01-30 09:58:46   Link

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net> wrote:

> http://www.garynorth.com/puritan_economic_experiments.pdf

>

> Read page 6 of this document describing the failure of their first experiment in common ownership of land and goods. It didn't work then and isn't working now. The young men refused to work the fields and the women thought dressing meat and washing clothes for the common good was nothing more than slavery. Once land was distributed and each family could work their own property, harvests were bountiful.

-------------

Didn't Bradford do that to stop one family from setting such a high

value on Indian goods that everyone else in the community could no

longer trade?

In that it was a reaction to the family that was given much of the

fertile land.

The whole basing who you were by your family and their ability to

profess better born again stories for the community. That was the

initial fail that the colony had to overcome.

--

Stephen Russell

901.246-0159 cell

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJE1rpUwMf8vv=sn0GQk5LmtVADUhOcgM-QY+xZpDg+5g@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2012 Stephen Russell