What's happening to dotNet Extender's website? It's been offline for
nearly a week...
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJCSeop-y92SGffTW60xLHBYTu+Mu4L+nEozx5uPx+mkmg@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
The entire project is down for nearly 2 years by now....
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Man-wai Chang <changmw@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's happening to dotNet Extender's website? It's been offline for
> nearly a week...
>
> --
> .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
> /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAH=CQDKoZ0vwCroB94hV3g6YCBNqFA2sOCXr5R1UCUtnUix0gQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
But its website was still around until very recently... Does this mean
DotNet Extender would no longer be supported?
BTW, does the product have an archive site?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Grigore Dolghin <gdolghin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The entire project is down for nearly 2 years by now....
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJBwwnBukTjQo=qdgw+QPWR_VwBW1Z4ZLh4yw3cQ9K8DaA@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
It was never a finished, functional product.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Man-wai Chang <changmw@gmail.com> wrote:
> But its website was still around until very recently... Does this mean
> DotNet Extender would no longer be supported?
>
> BTW, does the product have an archive site?
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Grigore Dolghin <gdolghin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The entire project is down for nearly 2 years by now....
>
> --
> .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
> / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
> /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
> ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAH=CQDKUZj4=1wOnwZzAAEFs77Eq2=jBNzmEkcQnnsr+B9KBtw@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
There's still chatter on the Google group about it, but it seems to be
mostly about reverse-engineering it to continue some other way.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1319464639.27243.140660989732957@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
What happened to the guy/s making it. It looked quite promising.
Are there alternatives now? There were about three at one time.
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Alan Bourke
There's still chatter on the Google group about it, but it seems to be
mostly about reverse-engineering it to continue some other way.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/007801cc925b$8c94e830$a5beb890$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Just glad I didn't shack out the money for it... I was very close
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
Sent: 24 October 2011 15:45
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: http://etecnologia.net/
What happened to the guy/s making it. It looked quite promising.
Are there alternatives now? There were about three at one time.
Al
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/BD031ECABF2B60499200AAB3DBB4A9997367283F@EX-A-FPL.FPL.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
I also was waiting to see how it went.
Al
-----Original Message-----
Just glad I didn't shack out the money for it... I was very close
Dave
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00b501cc925e$092b3730$1b81a590$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On 10/24/2011 10:55 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Just glad I didn't shack out the money for it... I was very close
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Allen
> Sent: 24 October 2011 15:45
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: http://etecnologia.net/
>
> What happened to the guy/s making it. It looked quite promising.
> Are there alternatives now? There were about three at one time.
> Al
>
I remember this one, Christof's, and the thing Craig Boyd and Bo Durban
(?) were going to do (VFPStudio?) but that effort was scrapped because
Microsoft kept changing something that they were going to use, iirc.
Vague recollections so I could be off on that.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4EA580BC.90504@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
The best way to build .NET applications is to build them in .NET from
scratch. Anything else is just improvisation.
Same rationale applies to conversion from FPD to VFP and I'm pretty sure you
guys agree with me here. Although FPD apps run under VFP, all you get is FPD
performance and features. If you want the best of VFP, build it in VFP.
-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 6:14 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: http://etecnologia.net/
On 10/24/2011 10:55 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Just glad I didn't shack out the money for it... I was very close
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On
> Behalf Of Allen
> Sent: 24 October 2011 15:45
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: http://etecnologia.net/
>
> What happened to the guy/s making it. It looked quite promising.
> Are there alternatives now? There were about three at one time.
> Al
>
I remember this one, Christof's, and the thing Craig Boyd and Bo Durban
(?) were going to do (VFPStudio?) but that effort was scrapped because
Microsoft kept changing something that they were going to use, iirc.
Vague recollections so I could be off on that.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000601cc9260$84476950$8cd63bf0$@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.