Index
2011-04-28 11:03Ted Roche : [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 11:22Jerry Foote : RE: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 11:40lelandj : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 12:01Nicholas Geti : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 12:02Nicholas Geti : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 12:54Pete Theisen : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 13:32lelandj : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 13:40Nicholas Geti : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 17:29Michael Madigan : RE: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
2011-04-28 17:33Michael Madigan : Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate
Back to top
[OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Ted Roche

Posted: 2011-04-28 11:03:36   Link

Jerry,

Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

Thanks.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote <jerryfoote@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When the

> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

> printer, same stock form.

>

> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>

> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

>

> Jerry

>

>

>

> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

> multipart/alternative

>  text/plain (text body -- kept)

>  text/html

> ---

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/BANLkTik2ck5kNiuGMqe66ncYW+BcvfJtVA@mail.gmail.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Ted Roche
Back to top
RE: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Jerry Foote

Posted: 2011-04-28 11:22:41   Link

Ok this is off topic, I found one comparison at this link

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not ignore

hard evidence.

Jerry

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Ted Roche

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:04 AM

To: profox@leafe.com

Subject: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Jerry,

Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

Thanks.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote <jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

wrote:

> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When the

> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

> printer, same stock form.

>

> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>

> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

>

> Jerry

>

>

>

> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

> multipart/alternative

>  text/plain (text body -- kept)

>  text/html

> ---

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/FDB9C86A76CE4A28849D407172036592@jerryfootePC

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Jerry Foote
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: lelandj

Posted: 2011-04-28 11:40:39   Link

Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

Regards,

LelandJ

On 04/28/2011 10:22 AM, Jerry Foote wrote:

> Ok this is off topic, I found one comparison at this link

> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not ignore

> hard evidence.

Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

Regards,

LelandJ

> Jerry

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

> Of Ted Roche

> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:04 AM

> To: profox@leafe.com

> Subject: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

>

> Jerry,

>

> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

>

> Thanks.

>

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote<jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

> wrote:

>> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

>> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When the

>> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

>> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

>> printer, same stock form.

>>

>> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>>

>> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

>>

>> Jerry

>>

>>

>>

>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

>> multipart/alternative

>> text/plain (text body -- kept)

>> text/html

>> ---

>>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4DB98A77.3050103@mail.smvfp.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 lelandj
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Nicholas Geti

Posted: 2011-04-28 12:01:14   Link

Obama has impugned every Republican for the last two years as a wacko for

doubting his birth certificate. It made good political press. But Trump has

turned the tables and Obama was forced to respond. It wasn't the Republicans

who started the whole thing anyway. It was Hillary Clinton who started it

during her presidential campaign. The Republicans then picked up on it

later.

Obama just kept it going by never coming forward with his real birth

certificate. In any case a couple of months ago the governor of Hawaii said

he couldn't find the long form birth certificate only adding to the doubt.

All the authorities in the world who said Obama was legal had no proof to

justify their opinions either.

So to accuse someone of being a wacko only indicates the caller has

displayed a lack of judgment and/or his political agenda.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jerry Foote" <jerryf@footegroup.com>

To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:22 AM

Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Ok this is off topic, I found one comparison at this link

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not ignore

hard evidence.

Jerry

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Ted Roche

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:04 AM

To: profox@leafe.com

Subject: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Jerry,

Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

Thanks.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote <jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

wrote:

> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When the

> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

> printer, same stock form.

>

> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>

> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

>

> Jerry

>

>

>

> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

> multipart/alternative

> text/plain (text body -- kept)

> text/html

> ---

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/283C94A56A5B4C2CBEBFBCFABDCD46CE@dual

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Nicholas Geti
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Nicholas Geti

Posted: 2011-04-28 12:02:17   Link

The true wacko has responded.

----- Original Message -----

From: "lelandj" <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com>

To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:40 AM

Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>

> Regards,

>

> LelandJ

>

>

> On 04/28/2011 10:22 AM, Jerry Foote wrote:

>> Ok this is off topic, I found one comparison at this link

>> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

>> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not

>> ignore

>> hard evidence.

>

> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>

> Regards,

>

> LelandJ

>

>> Jerry

>>

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On

>> Behalf

>> Of Ted Roche

>> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:04 AM

>> To: profox@leafe.com

>> Subject: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

>>

>> Jerry,

>>

>> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

>>

>> Thanks.

>>

>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote<jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

>> wrote:

>>> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

>>> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When

>>> the

>>> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

>>> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

>>> printer, same stock form.

>>>

>>> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>>>

>>> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

>>>

>>> Jerry

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

>>> multipart/alternative

>>> text/plain (text body -- kept)

>>> text/html

>>> ---

>>>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/591F009F245D4DB29122946A55E8B4EE@dual

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Nicholas Geti
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Pete Theisen

Posted: 2011-04-28 12:54:15   Link

Nicholas Geti wrote:

Hi Nicolas,

"Wacko"? Leland?

True he can't spell, his sentence structure is ungrammatical and his

thinking knee-jerk D, but "wacko"? Come to think of it . . .

> The true wacko has responded.

>

>> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>>> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not

>>> ignore

>>> hard evidence.

>> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>>> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

>>>

>>> Thanks.

>>>

>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote<jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

>>> wrote:

>>>> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

>>>> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When

>>>> the

>>>> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

>>>> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

>>>> printer, same stock form.

>>>>

>>>> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>>>>

>>>> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

--

Regards,

Pete

http://pete-theisen.com/

http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4DB99BB7.4040304@verizon.net

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Pete Theisen
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: lelandj

Posted: 2011-04-28 13:32:17   Link

Birthers believe President Obama is not a USA citizen, and is conspiring

to conceal it; because, it supports their underlying basic philosophies,

(eg who they are), and damn facts or proof indicate otherwise. LOL

Who are the birthers? The birthers profile indicates they are mostly

white, ultra-conservative, opportunistic Republicans, who strongly

believe the old order of thing must be maintained. They don't believe

in anything, except that they can promote conservative causes and their

own public image by doubting the facts. LOL

http://www.plazanoir.com/i-want-your-birth-certificate/

Regards,

LelandJ

On 04/28/2011 11:54 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:

> Nicholas Geti wrote:

>

> Hi Nicolas,

>

> "Wacko"? Leland?

>

> True he can't spell, his sentence structure is ungrammatical and his

> thinking knee-jerk D, but "wacko"? Come to think of it . . .

>

>> The true wacko has responded.

>>

>>> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>>>> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not

>>>> ignore

>>>> hard evidence.

>>> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>>>> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

>>>>

>>>> Thanks.

>>>>

>>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote<jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

>>>> wrote:

>>>>> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

>>>>> differences found when compared to another form known to be true. When

>>>>> the

>>>>> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

>>>>> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

>>>>> printer, same stock form.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>>>>>

>>>>> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder why?

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4DB9A4A1.6050309@mail.smvfp.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 lelandj
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Nicholas Geti

Posted: 2011-04-28 13:40:46   Link

Another wacko. He thinks his beard gives him more authority. Nothing in his

text indicates any facts. I do agree that whether Obama's birth certificate

is real or fake will not deter the believers.

----- Original Message -----

From: "lelandj" <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com>

To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>

Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:32 PM

Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

> Birthers believe President Obama is not a USA citizen, and is conspiring

> to conceal it; because, it supports their underlying basic philosophies,

> (eg who they are), and damn facts or proof indicate otherwise. LOL

>

> Who are the birthers? The birthers profile indicates they are mostly

> white, ultra-conservative, opportunistic Republicans, who strongly

> believe the old order of thing must be maintained. They don't believe

> in anything, except that they can promote conservative causes and their

> own public image by doubting the facts. LOL

>

> http://www.plazanoir.com/i-want-your-birth-certificate/

>

> Regards,

>

> LelandJ

>

> On 04/28/2011 11:54 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:

>> Nicholas Geti wrote:

>>

>> Hi Nicolas,

>>

>> "Wacko"? Leland?

>>

>> True he can't spell, his sentence structure is ungrammatical and his

>> thinking knee-jerk D, but "wacko"? Come to think of it . . .

>>

>>> The true wacko has responded.

>>>

>>>> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>>>>> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard pressed to not

>>>>> ignore

>>>>> hard evidence.

>>>> Hahahhahahahah. Good one.

>>>>> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic [OT].

>>>>>

>>>>> Thanks.

>>>>>

>>>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry

>>>>> Foote<jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>> I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted by oboma and the

>>>>>> differences found when compared to another form known to be true.

>>>>>> When

>>>>>> the

>>>>>> form was examined at a very high enlargement the background, and type

>>>>>> placement did not match, even though the form was printed on the same

>>>>>> printer, same stock form.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> When oboma say's he knows people still will not believe, I wonder

>>>>>> why?

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DC77D436E1BE423BA323FF93DAE2E51C@dual

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Nicholas Geti
Back to top
RE: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2011-04-28 17:29:51   Link

The Dan Rather Fake Bush Memos were written on a word processor and the Liberal media ran with it anyway. This Birth Certificate is surely a fake based on the hospital name, the green grid background, and other factors, but it doesn't matter. Only Trump has the balls to call him out and hopefully he calls it a fake too.

--- On Thu, 4/28/11, Jerry Foote <jerryf@footegroup.com> wrote:

> From: Jerry Foote <jerryf@footegroup.com>

> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>

> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, 11:22 AM

> Ok this is off topic, I found one

> comparison at this link

> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and hard

> pressed to not ignore

> hard evidence.

>

> Jerry

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com

> [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com]

> On Behalf

> Of Ted Roche

> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:04 AM

> To: profox@leafe.com

> Subject: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

>

> Jerry,

>

> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions Off-Topic

> [OT].

>

> Thanks.

>

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry Foote <jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

> wrote:

> > I remember seeing a comparison of the form submitted

> by oboma and the

> > differences found when compared to another form known

> to be true. When the

> > form was examined at a very high enlargement the

> background, and type

> > placement did not match, even though the form was

> printed on the same

> > printer, same stock form.

> >

> > Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

> >

> > When oboma say's he knows people still will not

> believe, I wonder why?

> >

> > Jerry

> >

> >

> >

> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

> > multipart/alternative

> >  text/plain (text body -- kept)

> >  text/html

> > ---

> >

> [excessive quoting removed by server]

>

> _______________________________________________

> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

> This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/FDB9C86A76CE4A28849D407172036592@jerryfootePC

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are

> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or

> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for

> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

>

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/19923.67859.qm@web31403.mail.mud.yahoo.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Michael Madigan
Back to top
Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2011-04-28 17:33:02   Link

Leland isn't a wacko, he's the core of the Democratic Party.

--- On Thu, 4/28/11, Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net> wrote:

> From: Nicholas Geti <ngeti@optonline.net>

> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>

> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011, 12:02 PM

> The true wacko has responded.

>

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: "lelandj" <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com>

> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>

> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:40 AM

> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

>

>

> > Hahahhahahahah.  Good one.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > LelandJ

> >

> >

> > On 04/28/2011 10:22 AM, Jerry Foote wrote:

> >> Ok this is off topic, I found one comparison at

> this link

> >> http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

> >> I assure you I am not a wacko, just curious and

> hard pressed to not

> >> ignore

> >> hard evidence.

> >

> > Hahahhahahahah.  Good one.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > LelandJ

> >

> >> Jerry

> >>

> >>

> >> -----Original Message-----

> >> From: profox-bounces@leafe.com

> [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com]

> On

> >> Behalf

> >> Of Ted Roche

> >> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:04 AM

> >> To: profox@leafe.com

> >> Subject: [OT] Re: Oboma Birth Certificate

> >>

> >> Jerry,

> >>

> >> Please flag your wacko misspelled delusions

> Off-Topic [OT].

> >>

> >> Thanks.

> >>

> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jerry

> Foote<jerryfoote@bellsouth.net>

> >> wrote:

> >>> I remember seeing a comparison of the form

> submitted by oboma and the

> >>> differences found when compared to another

> form known to be true. When

> >>> the

> >>> form was examined at a very high enlargement

> the background, and type

> >>> placement did not match, even though the form

> was printed on the same

> >>> printer, same stock form.

> >>>

> >>> Now I see this http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457.

> >>>

> >>> When oboma say's he knows people still will

> not believe, I wonder why?

> >>>

> >>> Jerry

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts

> ---

> >>> multipart/alternative

> >>>   text/plain (text body --

> kept)

> >>>   text/html

> >>> ---

> >>>

> [excessive quoting removed by server]

>

> _______________________________________________

> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

> This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/591F009F245D4DB29122946A55E8B4EE@dual

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are

> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or

> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for

> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

>

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/267655.67970.qm@web31403.mail.mud.yahoo.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2011 Michael Madigan