Hi chaps
I've now got the source code to a .NET project I'm trying to debug. This
has come from another developer.
My understanding of .NET projects is that they should always have a .SLN
or CSProj file which is akin to a PJX in Fox.
I'd normally open the .SLN in Visual Studio 2010 and there are the
project files.
This project doesn't have either so does that mean the backup is still
incomplete?
Regards
Graham
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0AF51B84D903A144B9EE71AEAFE7E81C0EBF1B@compsys1.CompySys.local
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Graham Brown wrote on 2011-02-23:
> Hi chaps
>
> I've now got the source code to a .NET project I'm trying to debug.
> This has come from another developer.
>
> My understanding of .NET projects is that they should always have a
> .SLN or CSProj file which is akin to a PJX in Fox.
> I'd normally open the .SLN in Visual Studio 2010 and there are the
> project files.
>
> This project doesn't have either so does that mean the backup is still
> incomplete?
>
> Regards
> Graham
>
Graham,
No. but that would mean the original programmer was doing it the hard way.
Is there a Make.cmd file in the mix? Or something similar like Build or
Compile?
However, I do suspect the backup is incomplete.
Tracy Pearson
PowerChurch Software
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000a01cbd371$267fdc70$737f9550$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Yes, it is incomplete. There is one more file, (extension .suo) which is
usually hidden. I believe that is missing too.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-
> bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Graham Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:20 PM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: [NF] Missing Source code for .NET
>
> Hi chaps
>
> I've now got the source code to a .NET project I'm trying to debug. This
has
> come from another developer.
>
> My understanding of .NET projects is that they should always have a .SLN
or
> CSProj file which is akin to a PJX in Fox.
> I'd normally open the .SLN in Visual Studio 2010 and there are the project
> files.
>
> This project doesn't have either so does that mean the backup is still
> incomplete?
>
> Regards
> Graham
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000301cbd371$ea1f34f0$be5d9ed0$@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:20 +0000, "Graham Brown" <info@compsys.co.uk>
wrote:
> Hi chaps
>
> My understanding of .NET projects is that they should always have a .SLN
> or CSProj file which is akin to a PJX in Fox.
> I'd normally open the .SLN in Visual Studio 2010 and there are the
> project files.
Not necessarily - those files are specific to Visual Studio. He could
equally have used MonoDevelop, or SharpDevelop, or no IDE at all.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1298478583.15275.1422994169@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Anyway, it's not a biggie - just create a new project and add the existing
items to it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-
> bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 6:30 PM
> To: profoxtech@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Missing Source code for .NET
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:20 +0000, "Graham Brown" <info@compsys.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > Hi chaps
> >
> > My understanding of .NET projects is that they should always have a
> > .SLN or CSProj file which is akin to a PJX in Fox.
> > I'd normally open the .SLN in Visual Studio 2010 and there are the
> > project files.
>
> Not necessarily - those files are specific to Visual Studio. He could
equally
> have used MonoDevelop, or SharpDevelop, or no IDE at all.
> --
> Alan Bourke
> alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000001cbd377$9939ebb0$cbadc310$@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Graham Brown <info@compsys.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi chaps
>
> I've now got the source code to a .NET project I'm trying to debug. This
> has come from another developer.
>
> My understanding of .NET projects is that they should always have a .SLN
> or CSProj file which is akin to a PJX in Fox.
> I'd normally open the .SLN in Visual Studio 2010 and there are the
> project files.
>
> This project doesn't have either so does that mean the backup is still
> incomplete?
-----------------------
What files did you get?
anything with a .cb or .vb?
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts
901.246-0159 cell
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/AANLkTi=ERF_8589zNAJnSB+LzrNn-FbrPdtsZjRb-3aC@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.