I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for supporting her over Obama is
that we can't afford a lot of time learning on the job when it comes to
defense and foreign policy. I believe that Hillary will make a lot fewer
mistakes when starting a new administration than Obama. His resume is just
too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just thinking he needs more
fleshing out in the resume before becoming president.
Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
Kristyne McDaniel
Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
I'd rather have someone not as mired into the political machine.
Someone fresh enough to be naive enough to think he can make a
difference, and to at least try to do the right thing. The difference
between them is only 5 years, but that's 5 more years of political
favors that need to be repaid at some point, for the NY senator. I'm
for Obama, all the way.
On Feb 13, 2008 1:33 AM, Kristyne McDaniel <newsbox@mcstyles.com> wrote:
> I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for supporting her over Obama
> is
> that we can't afford a lot of time learning on the job when it comes to
> defense and foreign policy. I believe that Hillary will make a lot fewer
> mistakes when starting a new administration than Obama. His resume is just
> too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just thinking he needs more
> fleshing out in the resume before becoming president.
>
> Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid of what will attach itself to Obs coattails.
He will be in for a rude awakening when every black person expects that he
will appoint black people to ALL of his positions across the nation.
I have seen this happen first hand in Memphis and it is not pretty the state
of our city today. Granted our local city and county politicians are so
caught up in the game of their office and not what that office should do.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN
901.246-0159
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
At this point in time I think Hillary would be better. She has more
experience, and is much better networked than Obama, and I think she
would be better able to push needed legislation through congress with
some arm twisting, than Obama would. She also has more history than
Obama which is both a good and bad thing.
Because Hillary has more History, I get a better idea of how she would
manage the executive branch, and she has a good network of candidates in
making her cabinet appointments. Obama is an unknown with little
history, so I don't have a clue about what his management style might
look like, as he tried to run the executive office, or who his cabinet
picks might be.
On the negative side Hillary's history includes all the enemies she made
during Bill's terms in office, and all the baggage she is carrying from
her attacks from the political right, which seem to have done a good job
of labeling her an up-tight liberal. Obama, having never been in the
national limelight, is fresh.
On the negative side of Obama having little history, it's unknown how he
would do under a "Swift Boat" like attack. Hillary has been thoroughly
investigated, so there is little about her, outside the record, that
could be attacked. If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, the
Republican will begin a very extensive investigation of him. They will
turn over ever rock Obama ever stepped on looking for anything that
could be used to attack him, and it remains to be seen what might be
brought to light about Obama that might cripple his chances of winning
the General Election.
One thing hurting Hillary is the way she appears on TV, and in photos.
She just doesn't seem able to take a decent picture. In front of people
she appear big eyed and excited, talks in a high pitched voice, is
proportionally shorter and heavier than Obama, and just generally seems
more up-tight. Obama on the other hand is comfortable and very relaxed
in front of people, is tall and slender, and talks in a very slow, deep
voice, and he takes great photos both in pictures and on camera. He
come across very relaxed, self-confident and it is easy to listen to his
inspiring speeches.
Another problem that Hillary has is many of her enemies would view her
presidency as another Bill Clinton Presidency in which she acted as
Bill's proxy. Also, having the wife of a former president become
president herself might set a bad precedent, which could come back to
haunt the country in future years.
Obama has done a good job as painting Hillary as part of the Washington
establishment, (eg same-o, same-o), but a Hillary Clinton
Administration, , if Hillary is elected President, would be a dramatic
change to the current Bush Administration, so claiming that Obama is the
candidate of change is really just a spin. Hillary Clinton would take
the country in a new direction perhaps more so than Obama.
Regards,
LelandJ
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 1:33 AM, Kristyne McDaniel <newsbox@mcstyles.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for supporting her over Obama
>> is
>> that we can't afford a lot of time learning on the job when it comes to
>> defense and foreign policy. I believe that Hillary will make a lot fewer
>> mistakes when starting a new administration than Obama. His resume is just
>> too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just thinking he needs more
>> fleshing out in the resume before becoming president.
>>
>> Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm afraid of what will attach itself to Obs coattails.
>
> He will be in for a rude awakening when every black person expects that he
> will appoint black people to ALL of his positions across the nation.
>
> I have seen this happen first hand in Memphis and it is not pretty the state
> of our city today. Granted our local city and county politicians are so
> caught up in the game of their office and not what that office should do.
>
Hillary Clinton is the wife of Bill Clinton, who was a two or three term
Governor of Arkansas and two term President of the US. Also, Hillary is
in her second term as a US Senator from NY, which is one of the most
populated states of the Country.
As wife to Governor Clinton and President Clinton, she acted as
Ambassador and confidant to the state of Arkansas and to America. Going
through all that provides a learning experience about politics, how
government work, and how to build a network of powerful legislators
needed to move legislation through the House and Senate, so she has
developed plenty of rough bark on her. She has about 35 years
experience being in and around politics, Government, and of public
service., but Obama is still really young to the game.
I would prefer Hillary Clinton to Obama, but life is good, as I like
both very much and either would put the USA back on the right path.
Heck, even a McCain Presidency would be a big improvement over the last
two Bush Administrations, and would inject a good dose of reality back
into the executive office. <g>.
Regards,
LelandJ
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Experience doing what? Threatening all of Bill
> Clinton's bimbos?
>
>
>
> --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> At this point in time I think Hillary would be
>> better. She has more
>> experience, and is much better networked than Obama,
>> and I think she
>> would be better able to push needed legislation
>> through congress with
>> some arm twisting, than Obama would. She also has
>> more history than
>> Obama which is both a good and bad thing.
>>
>> Because Hillary has more History, I get a better
>> idea of how she would
>> manage the executive branch, and she has a good
>> network of candidates in
>> making her cabinet appointments. Obama is an
>> unknown with little
>> history, so I don't have a clue about what his
>> management style might
>> look like, as he tried to run the executive office,
>> or who his cabinet
>> picks might be.
>>
>> On the negative side Hillary's history includes all
>> the enemies she made
>> during Bill's terms in office, and all the baggage
>> she is carrying from
>> her attacks from the political right, which seem to
>> have done a good job
>> of labeling her an up-tight liberal. Obama, having
>> never been in the
>> national limelight, is fresh.
>>
>> On the negative side of Obama having little history,
>> it's unknown how he
>> would do under a "Swift Boat" like attack. Hillary
>> has been thoroughly
>> investigated, so there is little about her, outside
>> the record, that
>> could be attacked. If Obama wins the Democratic
>> nomination, the
>> Republican will begin a very extensive investigation
>> of him. They will
>> turn over ever rock Obama ever stepped on looking
>> for anything that
>> could be used to attack him, and it remains to be
>> seen what might be
>> brought to light about Obama that might cripple his
>> chances of winning
>> the General Election.
>>
>> One thing hurting Hillary is the way she appears on
>> TV, and in photos.
>> She just doesn't seem able to take a decent picture.
>> In front of people
>> she appear big eyed and excited, talks in a high
>> pitched voice, is
>> proportionally shorter and heavier than Obama, and
>> just generally seems
>> more up-tight. Obama on the other hand is
>> comfortable and very relaxed
>> in front of people, is tall and slender, and talks
>> in a very slow, deep
>> voice, and he takes great photos both in pictures
>> and on camera. He
>> come across very relaxed, self-confident and it is
>> easy to listen to his
>> inspiring speeches.
>>
>> Another problem that Hillary has is many of her
>> enemies would view her
>> presidency as another Bill Clinton Presidency in
>> which she acted as
>> Bill's proxy. Also, having the wife of a former
>> president become
>> president herself might set a bad precedent, which
>> could come back to
>> haunt the country in future years.
>>
>> Obama has done a good job as painting Hillary as
>> part of the Washington
>> establishment, (eg same-o, same-o), but a Hillary
>> Clinton
>> Administration, , if Hillary is elected President,
>> would be a dramatic
>> change to the current Bush Administration, so
>> claiming that Obama is the
>> candidate of change is really just a spin. Hillary
>> Clinton would take
>> the country in a new direction perhaps more so than
>> Obama.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>>
>>
>> Stephen Russell wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 13, 2008 1:33 AM, Kristyne McDaniel
>>>
>> <newsbox@mcstyles.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for
>>>>
>> supporting her over Obama
>>
>>>> is
>>>> that we can't afford a lot of time learning on
>>>>
>> the job when it comes to
>>
>>>> defense and foreign policy. I believe that
>>>>
>> Hillary will make a lot fewer
>>
>>>> mistakes when starting a new administration than
>>>>
>> Obama. His resume is just
>>
>>>> too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just
>>>>
>> thinking he needs more
>>
>>>> fleshing out in the resume before becoming
>>>>
>> president.
>>
>>>> Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>> I'm afraid of what will attach itself to Obs
>>>
>> coattails.
>>
>>> He will be in for a rude awakening when every
>>>
>> black person expects that he
>>
>>> will appoint black people to ALL of his positions
>>>
>> across the nation.
>>
>>> I have seen this happen first hand in Memphis and
>>>
>> it is not pretty the state
>>
>>> of our city today. Granted our local city and
>>>
>> county politicians are so
>>
>>> caught up in the game of their office and not what
>>>
>> that office should do.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
>>
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/47B2FD4C.2040604@mail.smvfp.com
>
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
>>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
I like and respect you far too much to say.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
What experience does Hillary have? She has none too.
--- Kristyne McDaniel <newsbox@mcstyles.com> wrote:
> I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for
> supporting her over Obama is
> that we can't afford a lot of time learning on the
> job when it comes to
> defense and foreign policy. I believe that Hillary
> will make a lot fewer
> mistakes when starting a new administration than
> Obama. His resume is just
> too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just
> thinking he needs more
> fleshing out in the resume before becoming
> president.
>
> Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
>
> Kristyne McDaniel
> http://www.kristynemcdaniel.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/02ae01c86e12$d1e56e80$740a3f94@KristyneMB
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>
Member the "new fresh guy" Jimmy Carter? How did he
work out?
--- Vince Teachout <teachv@taconic.net> wrote:
> Kristyne McDaniel wrote:
>
> I'd rather have someone not as mired into the
> political machine.
> Someone fresh enough to be naive enough to think he
> can make a
> difference, and to at least try to do the right
> thing. The difference
> between them is only 5 years, but that's 5 more
> years of political
> favors that need to be repaid at some point, for the
> NY senator. I'm
> for Obama, all the way.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/47B2EC85.7090009@taconic.net
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>
And what's with the Che Guevara flags hanging in the
Obama offices? Don't they know that Guevara was a
murderous thug?
--- Stephen Russell <srussell705@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008 1:33 AM, Kristyne McDaniel
> <newsbox@mcstyles.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for
> supporting her over Obama
> > is
> > that we can't afford a lot of time learning on the
> job when it comes to
> > defense and foreign policy. I believe that Hillary
> will make a lot fewer
> > mistakes when starting a new administration than
> Obama. His resume is just
> > too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just
> thinking he needs more
> > fleshing out in the resume before becoming
> president.
> >
> > Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm afraid of what will attach itself to Obs
> coattails.
>
> He will be in for a rude awakening when every black
> person expects that he
> will appoint black people to ALL of his positions
> across the nation.
>
> I have seen this happen first hand in Memphis and it
> is not pretty the state
> of our city today. Granted our local city and
> county politicians are so
> caught up in the game of their office and not what
> that office should do.
> --
> Stephen Russell
> Sr. Production Systems Programmer
> Mimeo.com
> Memphis TN
>
> 901.246-0159
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe0802130615y2fb9aebfwdeed2735045c2350@mail.gmail.com
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>
Experience doing what? Threatening all of Bill
Clinton's bimbos?
--- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <lelandj@mail.smvfp.com>
wrote:
> At this point in time I think Hillary would be
> better. She has more
> experience, and is much better networked than Obama,
> and I think she
> would be better able to push needed legislation
> through congress with
> some arm twisting, than Obama would. She also has
> more history than
> Obama which is both a good and bad thing.
>
> Because Hillary has more History, I get a better
> idea of how she would
> manage the executive branch, and she has a good
> network of candidates in
> making her cabinet appointments. Obama is an
> unknown with little
> history, so I don't have a clue about what his
> management style might
> look like, as he tried to run the executive office,
> or who his cabinet
> picks might be.
>
> On the negative side Hillary's history includes all
> the enemies she made
> during Bill's terms in office, and all the baggage
> she is carrying from
> her attacks from the political right, which seem to
> have done a good job
> of labeling her an up-tight liberal. Obama, having
> never been in the
> national limelight, is fresh.
>
> On the negative side of Obama having little history,
> it's unknown how he
> would do under a "Swift Boat" like attack. Hillary
> has been thoroughly
> investigated, so there is little about her, outside
> the record, that
> could be attacked. If Obama wins the Democratic
> nomination, the
> Republican will begin a very extensive investigation
> of him. They will
> turn over ever rock Obama ever stepped on looking
> for anything that
> could be used to attack him, and it remains to be
> seen what might be
> brought to light about Obama that might cripple his
> chances of winning
> the General Election.
>
> One thing hurting Hillary is the way she appears on
> TV, and in photos.
> She just doesn't seem able to take a decent picture.
> In front of people
> she appear big eyed and excited, talks in a high
> pitched voice, is
> proportionally shorter and heavier than Obama, and
> just generally seems
> more up-tight. Obama on the other hand is
> comfortable and very relaxed
> in front of people, is tall and slender, and talks
> in a very slow, deep
> voice, and he takes great photos both in pictures
> and on camera. He
> come across very relaxed, self-confident and it is
> easy to listen to his
> inspiring speeches.
>
> Another problem that Hillary has is many of her
> enemies would view her
> presidency as another Bill Clinton Presidency in
> which she acted as
> Bill's proxy. Also, having the wife of a former
> president become
> president herself might set a bad precedent, which
> could come back to
> haunt the country in future years.
>
> Obama has done a good job as painting Hillary as
> part of the Washington
> establishment, (eg same-o, same-o), but a Hillary
> Clinton
> Administration, , if Hillary is elected President,
> would be a dramatic
> change to the current Bush Administration, so
> claiming that Obama is the
> candidate of change is really just a spin. Hillary
> Clinton would take
> the country in a new direction perhaps more so than
> Obama.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> LelandJ
>
>
>
> Stephen Russell wrote:
> > On Feb 13, 2008 1:33 AM, Kristyne McDaniel
> <newsbox@mcstyles.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I'm a Hillary supporter, and my main reason for
> supporting her over Obama
> >> is
> >> that we can't afford a lot of time learning on
> the job when it comes to
> >> defense and foreign policy. I believe that
> Hillary will make a lot fewer
> >> mistakes when starting a new administration than
> Obama. His resume is just
> >> too thin for me. I don't dislike him; I'm just
> thinking he needs more
> >> fleshing out in the resume before becoming
> president.
> >>
> >> Anyhow, that's my opinion. What's yours?
> >>
> >>
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I'm afraid of what will attach itself to Obs
> coattails.
> >
> > He will be in for a rude awakening when every
> black person expects that he
> > will appoint black people to ALL of his positions
> across the nation.
> >
> > I have seen this happen first hand in Memphis and
> it is not pretty the state
> > of our city today. Granted our local city and
> county politicians are so
> > caught up in the game of their office and not what
> that office should do.
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/47B2FD4C.2040604@mail.smvfp.com
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
>