Index
2005-06-01 11:38David Stevenson : Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 12:06Malcolm Greene : Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 12:15David Stevenson : RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 13:14Dave Crozier : RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 13:17Richard Kaye : Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 13:57David Stevenson : RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 15:03Ted Roche : Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 16:21Johnson, Fletcher S (N-Superior Technical Resources Inc.): RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 17:11Ted Roche : Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
2005-06-01 20:35Stephen the Cook : RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls
Back to top
Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: David Stevenson

Posted: 2005-06-01 11:38:27   Link

FoxTalk 2.0 has just published a free article with downloadable source code

by Lisa Slater Nicholls about generating PDFs from VFP output (and also from

pre-VFP versions of Fox). Lisa shows how to reliably and transparently

handle installation of GhostScript on the fly in your application without

any user intervention, and also provides some VFP9-specific code in her

PDFListener (although much of that code can also be extracted and used in

other versions of VFP).

This article with download is a major free resource for the Fox community,

and you'll learn a lot from reading (and re-reading) the article and

studying Lisa's code. I encourage you to check it out at:

http://tinyurl.com/bdl74

Enjoy!

David Stevenson

Editor, FoxTalk 2.0

www.foxtalknewsletter.com <http://www.foxtalknewsletter.com/>

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

multipart/alternative

text/plain (text body -- kept)

text/html

---

©2005 David Stevenson
Back to top
Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Malcolm Greene

Posted: 2005-06-01 12:06:01   Link

David,

Just sent you a similar message on the UT. Great article with lots of

worthwhile tips regardless of whether or not you have an existing PDF

solution.

Lurkers: Highly recommended!

Thanks David!

Malcolm

PS: I appreciate the tinyurl - makes a big difference when bookmarking a

FoxTalk URL to a text file. Might be a nice convention for all your

online FoxTalk articles to use?

©2005 Malcolm Greene
Back to top
RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: David Stevenson

Posted: 2005-06-01 12:15:14   Link

Malcolm,

I agree that the article has lots of valuable info even for those

comfortable with another PDF solution already. Lisa's code for installing

files stored in memo fields in pretty generic and adaptable for other

purposes, and there are lots of learning opportunities in seeing how she

uses some of the lesser-known properties and methods of the report listener.

Yes, TinyURL certainly does make it easier to post the links, and I'll be

using it in the future for free FoxTalk 2.0 links.

David Stevenson

Editor, FoxTalk 2.0

www.foxtalknewsletter.com

-----Original Message-----

From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On

Behalf Of Malcolm Greene

Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 1:06 PM

To: profoxtech@leafe.com

Subject: Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

David,

Just sent you a similar message on the UT. Great article with lots of

worthwhile tips regardless of whether or not you have an existing PDF

solution.

Lurkers: Highly recommended!

Thanks David!

Malcolm

PS: I appreciate the tinyurl - makes a big difference when bookmarking a

FoxTalk URL to a text file. Might be a nice convention for all your

online FoxTalk articles to use?

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2005 David Stevenson
Back to top
RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Dave Crozier

Posted: 2005-06-01 13:14:56   Link

David,

Excellent article link. Thanks for posting it. That reminds me, I need to

renew my subs after 6 months absence.

Dave Crozier

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of David Stevenson

Sent: 01 June 2005 17:38

To: profox@leafe.com

Subject: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

FoxTalk 2.0 has just published a free article with downloadable source code

by Lisa Slater Nicholls about generating PDFs from VFP output (and also from

pre-VFP versions of Fox). Lisa shows how to reliably and transparently

handle installation of GhostScript on the fly in your application without

any user intervention, and also provides some VFP9-specific code in her

PDFListener (although much of that code can also be extracted and used in

other versions of VFP).

This article with download is a major free resource for the Fox community,

and you'll learn a lot from reading (and re-reading) the article and

studying Lisa's code. I encourage you to check it out at:

http://tinyurl.com/bdl74

Enjoy!

David Stevenson

Editor, FoxTalk 2.0

www.foxtalknewsletter.com <http://www.foxtalknewsletter.com/>

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

multipart/alternative

text/plain (text body -- kept)

text/html

---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2005 Dave Crozier
Back to top
Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Richard Kaye

Posted: 2005-06-01 13:17:21   Link

A colleague of mine in Australia had given me and my partner a heads up

on this article. He ran into Lisa and Colin last year and casually

mentioned to her we were having some issues generating PDFs from our VFP

reports. Lisa apparently expressed herself to him in her usual forceful

way about VFP developers using 3rd party tools to accomplish something

that could be done for free using Ghostscript,etc. Then she decided to

write an article about it for Foxtalk. Does that mean we can get an

inspiration fee? <vbg>

David Stevenson wrote:

>FoxTalk 2.0 has just published a free article with downloadable source code

>by Lisa Slater Nicholls about generating PDFs from VFP output (and also from

>pre-VFP versions of Fox). Lisa shows how to reliably and transparently

>handle installation of GhostScript on the fly in your application without

>any user intervention, and also provides some VFP9-specific code in her

>PDFListener (although much of that code can also be extracted and used in

>other versions of VFP).

>

>

>

>This article with download is a major free resource for the Fox community,

>and you'll learn a lot from reading (and re-reading) the article and

>studying Lisa's code. I encourage you to check it out at:

>

>

>

--

Richard Kaye

RFC Systems

Voice: 973.761.0868

Fax: 973.761.4329

For the fastest response time, please send your tech support

queries to techsupport@rfcsystems.com

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

©2005 Richard Kaye
Back to top
RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: David Stevenson

Posted: 2005-06-01 13:57:04   Link

No inspiration fees. Sorry. Just enjoy the article and code!

Apparently, the reasons many VFP developers do not use GhostScript have to

do with either confusion about licensing requirements or difficulties in

getting it easily and reliably installed without user intervention.

Lisa solved both of these problems and wanted to make it available to all,

in the spirit of the Free Software roots of GhostScript.

David Stevenson

Editor, FoxTalk 2.0

www.foxtalknewsletter.com

-----Original Message-----

From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On

Behalf Of Richard Kaye

Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:17 PM

To: profoxtech@leafe.com

Subject: Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

A colleague of mine in Australia had given me and my partner a heads up

on this article. He ran into Lisa and Colin last year and casually

mentioned to her we were having some issues generating PDFs from our VFP

reports. Lisa apparently expressed herself to him in her usual forceful

way about VFP developers using 3rd party tools to accomplish something

that could be done for free using Ghostscript,etc. Then she decided to

write an article about it for Foxtalk. Does that mean we can get an

inspiration fee? <vbg>

David Stevenson wrote:

>FoxTalk 2.0 has just published a free article with downloadable source code

>by Lisa Slater Nicholls about generating PDFs from VFP output (and also

from

>pre-VFP versions of Fox). Lisa shows how to reliably and transparently

>handle installation of GhostScript on the fly in your application without

>any user intervention, and also provides some VFP9-specific code in her

>PDFListener (although much of that code can also be extracted and used in

>other versions of VFP).

>

>

>

>This article with download is a major free resource for the Fox community,

>and you'll learn a lot from reading (and re-reading) the article and

>studying Lisa's code. I encourage you to check it out at:

>

>

>

--

Richard Kaye

RFC Systems

Voice: 973.761.0868

Fax: 973.761.4329

For the fastest response time, please send your tech support

queries to techsupport@rfcsystems.com

---------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2005 David Stevenson
Back to top
Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Ted Roche

Posted: 2005-06-01 15:03:22   Link

On Jun 1, 2005, at 2:57 PM, David Stevenson wrote:

> Apparently, the reasons many VFP developers do not use GhostScript

> have to

> do with either confusion about licensing requirements or

> difficulties in

> getting it easily and reliably installed without user intervention.

I was not aware of the alternative GPL and/or GNU distributions, and

had reviewed the Aladdin license and then purchased commercial

licenses. I do support a number of clients with PDF output options,

mostly using PDF995 and pdfFactory. For the expense involved, the

added benefits of the installer and printer driver technology were

worth the costs to my clients. However, I'll have to review LSN's

articles - a brief skim shows some brilliant ideas, as usual.

Of course, on my Mac, I can save anything to PDF. It's built in.

Linux, too, of course. It's too bad the Microsoft chooses to distance

itself so far behind the other systems...

©2005 Ted Roche
Back to top
RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Johnson, Fletcher S (N-Superior Technical Resources Inc.)

Posted: 2005-06-01 16:21:20   Link

Ted,

Now now...

>>Of course, on my Mac, I can save anything to PDF. It's built in.

Linux, too, of course. It's too bad the Microsoft chooses to distance

itself so far behind the other systems...<<

We all know that if MS were to make generating a PDF file a native part

of the OS, then everyone who writes these add on tools would complain

that the nasty MS monopoly is destroying their livelihood on a whim.

(Look at the media player developers, etc.)

The fact that MS hasn't done it doesn't mean that they don't want to do

so. It's just a matter of trying to decide which features are important

enough to add when they know that doing so will most likely result in

more (or support existing) litigation.

Gee, either they (MS) are:

evil because they are now giving away the software that someone sells

for a living - that's anti competitive

- or -

evil because they won't give away software for free (who cares about

those whining developers - make my life easier)

Which way do you want it today?

Take care,

Fletcher

-----Original Message-----

From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com]

On Behalf Of Ted Roche

Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 1:03 PM

To: profoxtech@leafe.com

Subject: Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

On Jun 1, 2005, at 2:57 PM, David Stevenson wrote:

> Apparently, the reasons many VFP developers do not use GhostScript

> have to

> do with either confusion about licensing requirements or

> difficulties in

> getting it easily and reliably installed without user intervention.

I was not aware of the alternative GPL and/or GNU distributions, and

had reviewed the Aladdin license and then purchased commercial

licenses. I do support a number of clients with PDF output options,

mostly using PDF995 and pdfFactory. For the expense involved, the

added benefits of the installer and printer driver technology were

worth the costs to my clients. However, I'll have to review LSN's

articles - a brief skim shows some brilliant ideas, as usual.

Of course, on my Mac, I can save anything to PDF. It's built in.

Linux, too, of course. It's too bad the Microsoft chooses to distance

itself so far behind the other systems...

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2005 Johnson, Fletcher S (N-Superior Technical Resources Inc.)
Back to top
Re: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Ted Roche

Posted: 2005-06-01 17:11:51   Link

On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Johnson, Fletcher S (N-Superior Technical

Resources Inc.) wrote:

> We all know that if MS were to make generating a PDF file a native

> part

> of the OS, then everyone who writes these add on tools would complain

> that the nasty MS monopoly is destroying their livelihood on a whim.

> (Look at the media player developers, etc.)

Well, I didnt' claim they wouldn't be damned either way. I'm not sure

that's an option any more.

I'm sure Nico Mak (of WinZIP fame) feels similarly.

And the disk compression software - what was their name?

©2005 Ted Roche
Back to top
RE: Major PDF article by Lisa Slater Nicholls

Author: Stephen the Cook

Posted: 2005-06-01 20:35:57   Link

Johnson, Fletcher S (N-Superior Technical Resources Inc.) <> wrote this on

Wednesday, June 01, 2005 4:21 PM:

> The fact that MS hasn't done it doesn't mean that they don't want to

> do so. It's just a matter of trying to decide which features are

> important enough to add when they know that doing so will most likely

> result in more (or support existing) litigation.

>

> Gee, either they (MS) are:

> evil because they are now giving away the software that someone sells

> for a living - that's anti competitive - or -

> evil because they won't give away software for free (who cares about

> those whining developers - make my life easier)

>

> Which way do you want it today?

Been doing it for years with .NET.

Stephen Russell

S.R. & Associates

Memphis, TN 38115

901.246-0159

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

©2005 Stephen the Cook