On 2016-12-01 06:27, Ted Roche wrote:

> Agree. Depends on the level of security you want/need. Compiling

> encrypted is enough to deter most. Nearly all Fox EXE / DLL can be

> decrypted, so if you *really* need it secure, look to a 3rd party

> solution, or move the secure parts off the client's machine and

> require them to contact a web resource you control so they can't

> access it.

I recall somebody mentioning Armadillo to protect your EXEs in the past

(from reverse engineering):

http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Programming/Registration_Tools/The_Armadillo_Software_Protection_System.html

ReFox also offers protection: http://www.refox.net/-overview.html

Can you think of any other tool preferable to use for protecting your

deployed apps?

Any comments on the two mentioned above?

tia,

--Mike

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ed83e93973899f647c9725b8deb6b380@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.