Re: Designing archives into your VFP-backend application

Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

Posted: 2017-12-29 at 10:34:55

Hi Steve,

Again, it's not an issue with non-VFP backends like MySQL. This was

about the VFP-backend folks. If I were to redesign an app, I would use

MariaDB as the backend if I could.

HNY!

--Mike

On 2017-12-29 11:26, Stephen Russell wrote:

> Why not create a Data Warehouse for that data and archive it that way.

> You

> can put that into mySQL and remove it from .dbfs at the same time.

>

> Create your Fact and Dimension tables to contain the true data needed

> for

> your DW over the long haul. Then you can investigate a variety of

> tools to

> enable Data Analytics going forward. This might give you some ideas on

> that.

> https://blog.capterra.com/free-and-open-source-data-visualization-tools/

>

>

>

> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:47 AM, <

> mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

>

>> I've seen long-time softwares with VFP backends that had a ton of data

>> (10+ years worth) and I had devised a method in one case recently to

>> be

>> able to "archive" old data by storing it in a subfolder intelligently

>> (so

>> it could be easily retrieved and/or reimported into the main data

>> set). I

>> haven't used a VFP backend since 2004 when Bob Lee introduced me to

>> the

>> MySQL world but nonetheless I thought I'd ask if devs here ever put

>> anything like an "archiving" feature into their software, and how they

>> do

>> it. In my case, instead of slinging 600MB of data across the network

>> (in

>> the case of one of my clients), my archiving showed a reduction of

>> like

>> 75%, so only 25% of that was being pulled across the LAN instead.

>> (They

>> didn't need all the data from the beginning of the App's time...they

>> just

>> needed relevant/recent data.)

>>

>> I realize that with MySQL and other such RDBMSes this is a non-issue,

>> but

>> I wanted to ask the VFP-backend folks their approach to this for the

>> sake

>> of (hopefully) interesting discussion. One final juicy thread before

>> 2017

>> is finished. :-)

>>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/d60f6dcc21de2cbb42bd18582f10591d@mbsoftwaresolutions.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

©2017 mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com