At 02:46 2018-09-05, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm> wrote:

>On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, at 7:35 PM, Kevin J Cully wrote:

> > Instead of using Outlook automation, and risking it breaking during

> > every upgrade, and potentially being marked as a spammer, perhaps using

> > a transactional email service might be an approach to consider.

>

>This is definitely the way to go these days for bulk sending.

>Outlook, and specifically Outlook connected to hosted Exchange, is

>not designed to do bulk sends.

The problem happens on the *first* E-mail.

We are not doing bulk sends. Each of the E-mails is

different. They are monthly invoices and possibly some other

reports. There are less than 100 of them, and they are sent one at a

time as they get completed.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cb3efa59dbe50705071cee8cbe4d558e@mtlp000086

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.