At 12:56 2017-06-08, Ted Roche <tedroche@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> wrote:

> >

> > I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others that

> > are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.

> >

> > While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only are not

> > great but are horrid.

>I suspect we have all seen tens of thousands of web pages, most

>mediocre or worse, while we've probably only seen hundreds of Windows

>and DOS data entry screens, most mediocre or worse.

Whoa! Mediocre is one thing. Uninspired still does the

job. It is the "or worse" that gets me. How people figure that a

Webpage or app should be like that is beyond me.

>UX is hard.

No, UX is fairly easy at a basic level.

I can deal with an uninspired Webpage or app.

Inspired UX is can be very hard indeed. I appreciate when I see it.

I do not complain much about uninspired, but I detest horrid.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b8d1dcf805bd0c6bfc7aca4068b510b9@mtlp000086

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.