>I don't wanna offend anyone, but are you sure that your framework is PERFECTO?

>How many expert Foxpro programmers had tested your framework? :)

Huh?

The framework was developed for a specialized purpose specific to the

industry I work in. It's not a general-purpose framework. It's not

for sale. It wasn't created to compete with other frameworks. It's

been in use since 2007 and like anything else, it has its share of

bugs. However, the software developed on top of it works great and

has been well-received.

The problems I've been reporting relate to my framework code. Some

expert Foxpro programmers on this list have made suggestions in

response. When appropriate, I have simply said that many of those

suggestions are already part of the framework. In fact, some examples

of this were in the code I posted with my original question, which

was in the file to which I provided a link. That original post has

just now shown up here (at least for me), two days late, this afternoon.

Ken Dibble

www.stic-cil.org

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/F0.07.27276.F488AA55@cdptpa-oedge01

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.